MOTM

I have suspected something like this......



At 06:54 PM 2/26/01 -0600, you wrote:

>Despite his every attempt to hide this from the
>rest of us, I found out today from a very reliable
>source, that our very own Dave Bradley, aka Moe,
>is actually a close relative of the president of the
>United States.
>
>Check out the evidence for yourself
>Larry
>
>http://24.12.85.234/larry/mobush.jpg

In a message dated 2/26/2001 3:52:51 PM, jlarryh@... writes:

>our very own Dave Bradley, aka Moe,
>is actually a close relative of the president of the
>United States.

Giving rise to chants of, "four Moe years!"

JB
"Mr. Bush, how do you stand on the LED controversy? Blinking or continuously 
varying with a modules output?"

RECOUNT!!!!!   : )
Jim

J. Larry Hendry wrote:

> Despite his every attempt to hide this from the
> rest of us, I found out today from a very reliable
> source, that our very own Dave Bradley, aka Moe,
> is actually a close relative of the president of the
> United States.
>
> Check out the evidence for yourself
> Larry
>
> http://24.12.85.234/larry/mobush.jpg
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

read my lips......... aint      gonna     do       it

: )
Jim
jwbarlow@... wrote:

> In a message dated 2/26/2001 3:52:51 PM, jlarryh@... writes:
>
> >our very own Dave Bradley, aka Moe,
> >is actually a close relative of the president of the
> >United States.
>
> Giving rise to chants of, "four Moe years!"
>
> JB
> "Mr. Bush, how do you stand on the LED controversy? Blinking or continuously
> varying with a modules output?"
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Despite his every attempt to hide this from the
rest of us, I found out today from a very reliable
source, that our very own Dave Bradley, aka Moe,
is actually a close relative of the president of the
United States.

Check out the evidence for yourself
Larry

http://24.12.85.234/larry/mobush.jpg

Why you..

It is beneath my dignity to respond to those scurrilous stooges 
attempting to besmirch the dignity of my high office.

If you're going to run a smear campaign, don't insult me with that 
cheesy, obviously doctored photo. It's nothing like reality.

Here's the REAL MOE:

http://www.users.qwest.net/~daveb2/images/the-real-moe.jpg

Humpf.

Moe

--- In motm@y..., jwbarlow@a... wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 2/26/2001 3:52:51 PM, jlarryh@i... writes:
> 
> >our very own Dave Bradley, aka Moe,
> >is actually a close relative of the president of the
> >United States.
> 
> Giving rise to chants of, "four Moe years!"
> 
> JB
> "Mr. Bush, how do you stand on the LED controversy? Blinking or 
continuously 
> varying with a modules output?"

I seem to remember some mention of this a few weeks ago, and a
listmember has emailed me privately to ask about it, so here's a little
bit of info. The module is not an oscillator in itself, but needs to be
driven by a square/pulse wave. there are 64 digital waveforms available,
divided up thusly: a switch selects one of two groups, each group
contains  4 banks, and each bank contains 8 waveforms.  The waveforms
are genrally interesting, synthetic sounding, and work well with filters
- high resonance picks out interesting harmonics!  The banks and waves
can be selected by pushbutton, or by a trigger input.  it does *not* do
wave table sweeps like a ppg or wiard waveform city.   The 19a divides
the driving pulse wave by the number of steps in the waveform.  I didn't
check too carefully, I'm embarrased to admit, but I think its /16 IE 4
octaves down.  It will track right down into the LFO range, so you can
get weird pattern lfo sweeps, or even sequencer effects with a little
fiddling.   There are 2 things I haven't tried yet.  One of them is
driving it from a MOTM VCO - the modcan vco's square and saw outs are
+ve going only, as opposed to MOTM's bipolar waves, but I don't forsee
any problems.  The other thing is the "sync" socket.  this works like
the sync socket on a regular VCO, but one sweeps the driving oscillator
to get the effect.  I'm guessing that on receiving a "leading edge", the
module resets the wave to its start.  I'll test both these things on
wednesday, and report.
Now, there was some mention of a larry h motm format panel for this,
IIRC, and also IIRC, I believe that someone mentiones that paul s wasn't
panning a wavetable module? Please correct if I'm wrong.  Of course,I
had to ask modcan's bruce duncan if he'd be willing to supply  an ultra-
basic stripped down vesion of the modcan wavetable oscillator, so
(larry) could possibly produce panels for it.  

his reply....

"Maybe...If enough people were interested I could modify the design to
suit
I need to find a supply for the 2732 non cmos eeprom that the wavetable 
uses as my current supply is getting low.
Tell the guy to contact me and perhaps we can arrange something."
  
So, I'm wondering what the interest would be, and if larry would be up
for it?  Oh, the power requirements are compatible with MOTM, although
the connector on the wavetable pcb is a three-pin version of the MOTM
connector, with only one (centre) ground wire.  

I should point out that I wouldn't be up for a stooge panel for my 19a
module, as I *really* like modcan's graphics, and I'm building MOTM and
Modcan systems up in parallel (score so far - motm 10, modcan 6), in
seperate cases...however.....I know a lot of you are motm-format only
types...

best etc.
-- 
NoRMaN FaY
check out my /<-r/-\/> new band!!!
www.blueappleboy.co.uk
(no pics of me there yet!)

I may be interested if the price is right.

-- 
James Holloway
jimh54@... - email
(972) 993-2023 x1188 - voicemail/fax



---- norman fay <kay-rad@...> wrote:
> I seem to remember some mention of this a few weeks ago, and a
> listmember has emailed me privately to ask about it, so here's a little
> bit of info. The module is not an oscillator in itself, but needs to
> be
> driven by a square/pulse wave. there are 64 digital waveforms available,
> divided up thusly: a switch selects one of two groups, each group
> contains  4 banks, and each bank contains 8 waveforms.  The waveforms
> are genrally interesting, synthetic sounding, and work well with filters
> - high resonance picks out interesting harmonics!  The banks and waves
> can be selected by pushbutton, or by a trigger input.  it does *not*
> do
> wave table sweeps like a ppg or wiard waveform city.   The 19a divides
> the driving pulse wave by the number of steps in the waveform.  I didn't
> check too carefully, I'm embarrased to admit, but I think its /16 IE
> 4
> octaves down.  It will track right down into the LFO range, so you
> can
> get weird pattern lfo sweeps, or even sequencer effects with a little
> fiddling.   There are 2 things I haven't tried yet.  One of them is
> driving it from a MOTM VCO - the modcan vco's square and saw outs are
> +ve going only, as opposed to MOTM's bipolar waves, but I don't forsee
> any problems.  The other thing is the "sync" socket.  this works like
> the sync socket on a regular VCO, but one sweeps the driving oscillator
> to get the effect.  I'm guessing that on receiving a "leading edge",
> the
> module resets the wave to its start.  I'll test both these things on
> wednesday, and report.
> Now, there was some mention of a larry h motm format panel for this,
> IIRC, and also IIRC, I believe that someone mentiones that paul s wasn't
> panning a wavetable module? Please correct if I'm wrong.  Of course,I
> had to ask modcan's bruce duncan if he'd be willing to supply  an ultra-
> basic stripped down vesion of the modcan wavetable oscillator, so
> (larry) could possibly produce panels for it.  
> 
> his reply....
> 
> "Maybe...If enough people were interested I could modify the design
> to
> suit
> I need to find a supply for the 2732 non cmos eeprom that the wavetable
> 
> uses as my current supply is getting low.
> Tell the guy to contact me and perhaps we can arrange something."
>   
> So, I'm wondering what the interest would be, and if larry would be
> up
> for it?  Oh, the power requirements are compatible with MOTM, although
> the connector on the wavetable pcb is a three-pin version of the MOTM
> connector, with only one (centre) ground wire.  
> 
> I should point out that I wouldn't be up for a stooge panel for my
> 19a
> module, as I *really* like modcan's graphics, and I'm building MOTM
> and
> Modcan systems up in parallel (score so far - motm 10, modcan 6), in
> seperate cases...however.....I know a lot of you are motm-format only
> types...
> 
> best etc.
> -- 
> NoRMaN FaY
> check out my /<-r/-\/> new band!!!
> www.blueappleboy.co.uk
> (no pics of me there yet!)
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place.
Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com

lets try and wait for the Blacet Miniwave. Im sure John will have a nice
redesign for it.
Jim

James Holloway wrote:

> I may be interested if the price is right.
>
> --
> James Holloway
> jimh54@... - email
> (972) 993-2023 x1188 - voicemail/fax
>
> ---- norman fay <kay-rad@...> wrote:
> > I seem to remember some mention of this a few weeks ago, and a
> > listmember has emailed me privately to ask about it, so here's a little
> > bit of info. The module is not an oscillator in itself, but needs to
> > be
> > driven by a square/pulse wave. there are 64 digital waveforms available,
> > divided up thusly: a switch selects one of two groups, each group
> > contains  4 banks, and each bank contains 8 waveforms.  The waveforms
> > are genrally interesting, synthetic sounding, and work well with filters
> > - high resonance picks out interesting harmonics!  The banks and waves
> > can be selected by pushbutton, or by a trigger input.  it does *not*
> > do
> > wave table sweeps like a ppg or wiard waveform city.   The 19a divides
> > the driving pulse wave by the number of steps in the waveform.  I didn't
> > check too carefully, I'm embarrased to admit, but I think its /16 IE
> > 4
> > octaves down.  It will track right down into the LFO range, so you
> > can
> > get weird pattern lfo sweeps, or even sequencer effects with a little
> > fiddling.   There are 2 things I haven't tried yet.  One of them is
> > driving it from a MOTM VCO - the modcan vco's square and saw outs are
> > +ve going only, as opposed to MOTM's bipolar waves, but I don't forsee
> > any problems.  The other thing is the "sync" socket.  this works like
> > the sync socket on a regular VCO, but one sweeps the driving oscillator
> > to get the effect.  I'm guessing that on receiving a "leading edge",
> > the
> > module resets the wave to its start.  I'll test both these things on
> > wednesday, and report.
> > Now, there was some mention of a larry h motm format panel for this,
> > IIRC, and also IIRC, I believe that someone mentiones that paul s wasn't
> > panning a wavetable module? Please correct if I'm wrong.  Of course,I
> > had to ask modcan's bruce duncan if he'd be willing to supply  an ultra-
> > basic stripped down vesion of the modcan wavetable oscillator, so
> > (larry) could possibly produce panels for it.
> >
> > his reply....
> >
> > "Maybe...If enough people were interested I could modify the design
> > to
> > suit
> > I need to find a supply for the 2732 non cmos eeprom that the wavetable
> >
> > uses as my current supply is getting low.
> > Tell the guy to contact me and perhaps we can arrange something."
> >
> > So, I'm wondering what the interest would be, and if larry would be
> > up
> > for it?  Oh, the power requirements are compatible with MOTM, although
> > the connector on the wavetable pcb is a three-pin version of the MOTM
> > connector, with only one (centre) ground wire.
> >
> > I should point out that I wouldn't be up for a stooge panel for my
> > 19a
> > module, as I *really* like modcan's graphics, and I'm building MOTM
> > and
> > Modcan systems up in parallel (score so far - motm 10, modcan 6), in
> > seperate cases...however.....I know a lot of you are motm-format only
> > types...
> >
> > best etc.
> > --
> > NoRMaN FaY
> > check out my /<-r/-\/> new band!!!
> > www.blueappleboy.co.uk
> > (no pics of me there yet!)
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place.
> Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

I agree-- Mr. Blacet's already been VERY accomidating towards our group, and
I'd like to see what he produces.  This isn't a knock against the ModCan
design, mind you, but rather a statement of confidence towards the Blacet
module and the desire not to get too repeatative in design.

--PBr

-----Original Message-----
From: bigd@... [mailto:bigd@...]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 5:48 AM
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [motm] modcan 19a wavetable "oscillator"


lets try and wait for the Blacet Miniwave. Im sure John will have a nice
redesign for it.
Jim

James Holloway wrote:

> I may be interested if the price is right.
>
> --
> James Holloway
> jimh54@... - email
> (972) 993-2023 x1188 - voicemail/fax
>
> ---- norman fay <kay-rad@...> wrote:
> > So, I'm wondering what the interest would be, and if larry would be
> > up
> > for it?

I would like to echo comments other have made concerning the hopefully
upcoming Blacet module.  I personally plan to wait and purchase one of those
when John gets finished with it.

Concerning panel fronts, I would like to clarify a couple of things.

1.  These are Dave Bradley's creations.  He is the one behind all the leg
work and personal trail and error to make the panels available for Blacet
conversions, DIY stuff and other 3rd party PCBs.  So, I take no offense with
anyone saying, "Larry's panels" as long as people understand where the
credit belongs for the artwork and screening and such.  Essentially, I am
just the order taker / money collector.  And, of course, maker of the
brackets that match up with Dave's panels.  I jumped into this process with
Dave, not to take credit for any of the work, but to help share the huge
workload involved with taking orders, collecting money, shipping and all of
those non-technical jobs that somehow must still be done to a make this all
work.

2. Assuming interest (and I think that is safe) Dave and I do plan to do
this again this year.  Perhaps it may coincide with an announcement of the
Blacet Miniwave.  Who knows?  We are not privy to John's schedule or
progress.  But, when there is a module, there will certainly be a MOTM
format panel to attach it to for those that want to go to the extra trouble
involved in the format conversion.  And, all of the old screens are still
available for future Dark Stars, Time Machines, 822s and the rest.

Larry Hendry

Ken Stone Just sent me six boards that hold the table roms and then use
another vco. The trick her is if you have decent collection of VCOs you
can design some nice sounds.

The tracks file is still up at Sasami

g Wong

norman fay wrote:

> 
> I seem to remember some mention of this a few weeks ago, and a
> listmember has emailed me privately to ask about it, so here's a little
> bit of info. The module is not an oscillator in itself, but needs to be
> driven by a square/pulse wave. there are 64 digital waveforms available,
> divided up thusly: a switch selects one of two groups, each group
> contains  4 banks, and each bank contains 8 waveforms.  The waveforms
> are genrally interesting, synthetic sounding, and work well with filters
> - high resonance picks out interesting harmonics!  The banks and waves
> can be selected by pushbutton, or by a trigger input.  it does *not* do
> wave table sweeps like a ppg or wiard waveform city.   The 19a divides
> the driving pulse wave by the number of steps in the waveform.  I didn't
> check too carefully, I'm embarrased to admit, but I think its /16 IE 4
> octaves down.  It will track right down into the LFO range, so you can
> get weird pattern lfo sweeps, or even sequencer effects with a little
> fiddling.   There are 2 things I haven't tried yet.  One of them is
> driving it from a MOTM VCO - the modcan vco's square and saw outs are
> +ve going only, as opposed to MOTM's bipolar waves, but I don't forsee
> any problems.  The other thing is the "sync" socket.  this works like
> the sync socket on a regular VCO, but one sweeps the driving oscillator
> to get the effect.  I'm guessing that on receiving a "leading edge", the
> module resets the wave to its start.  I'll test both these things on
> wednesday, and report.
> Now, there was some mention of a larry h motm format panel for this,
> IIRC, and also IIRC, I believe that someone mentiones that paul s wasn't
> panning a wavetable module? Please correct if I'm wrong.  Of course,I
> had to ask modcan's bruce duncan if he'd be willing to supply  an ultra-
> basic stripped down vesion of the modcan wavetable oscillator, so
> (larry) could possibly produce panels for it.
> 
> his reply....
> 
> "Maybe...If enough people were interested I could modify the design to
> suit
> I need to find a supply for the 2732 non cmos eeprom that the wavetable
> uses as my current supply is getting low.
> Tell the guy to contact me and perhaps we can arrange something."
> 
> So, I'm wondering what the interest would be, and if larry would be up
> for it?  Oh, the power requirements are compatible with MOTM, although
> the connector on the wavetable pcb is a three-pin version of the MOTM
> connector, with only one (centre) ground wire.
> 
> I should point out that I wouldn't be up for a stooge panel for my 19a
> module, as I *really* like modcan's graphics, and I'm building MOTM and
> Modcan systems up in parallel (score so far - motm 10, modcan 6), in
> seperate cases...however.....I know a lot of you are motm-format only
> types...
> 
> best etc.
> --
> NoRMaN FaY
> check out my /<-r/-\/> new band!!!
> www.blueappleboy.co.uk
> (no pics of me there yet!)
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/