Many years ago I used to hang out with an older guy that owned a music store (he was trying to get a "Hawaiian" band started as I remember). He told me that in the earliest days of recording studios, they were typically built above things like huge cellars or abandoned subway tunnels and things. Mics & speakers tied to the console were dangled down into these big, complex chambers and there was your reverb! With the advent of clean, controllable electronic ambience, the trend through the latter part of the century (soon to be 'last' century...yikes!) was of course to record dry and then add the reverb in the mix. Then some producers (I remember Daniel Lanois taking a lot of bows for this) came up with the radical idea that perhaps ambience could be recorded along with the music in the performance space (I guess they had never heard of orchestral music before...). I always find the idea of introducing complex behaviors into electronic music enticing, and letting a little "nature" seep into the circuit sure fits the bill. In the spring reverb days, we took it for granted that you would have a big tank full of springs on the floor a few feet away from the console... why not return to that idea? Having a generic 'resonator' module which is basically the driver/receiver from a reverb unit, but where the 'springs' can be anything you want? I imagine that some clever physical design could be devised to make easily swappable "cartridges" for the tank. Loads of fun experimentation could be had. To go further, perhaps the receive end could have some kind of DSP to do time/pitch-shifting, etc., to extend the effects of the resonators (make them sound "bigger").
Message
RE: [motm] resonating bodies
2000-12-29 by Tkacs, Ken
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.