can't wait to get one... peace, doc --- In motm@egroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@a...> wrote: > Working on the MOTM-101. Some things to report: > > a) Upgrading the op amp in the white noise amps to make even *whiter* noise. > Also, the new amp > runs at a lower gain, so more noise gets through. > > b) Switching the normalized S&H input from WHITE to PINK noise. There reason > is that there is such > more high-frequency content that the distribution of "random samples" was > too close to 0 volts (which is what > it's *supposed* to be!) But that makes for boring S&H noodlings. So > switching to PINK as the default > causes a much wider distribution of output voltages. > > c) Not changing the internal clock range all that much. It is still on the > "slow" side. If you need exact clocking > in the 1Hz to 10Hz range, use a MOTM-320. The max rate is still about 15Hz, > same as the '100. With an EXT CLK, > you can sample up to about 4Khz for some "lo-fi" Mirage sampling effects. > > All that is left to mess with is the SLEW. Since all I can use is 100K log > pots, I have to use larger cap and > the op amps don't like that. The max. SLEW may be about 0.5sec. Of course, > the MOTM-820 can slew *minutes*. > > Paul S.
Message
Re: MOTM-101 report
2000-12-26 by doc pendergast
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.