In a message dated 00-11-23 14:54:40 EST, you write: << Which leads us to which conclusion about the previous "flow of information" >> jurgen, i`m not in a position to know whether you are right or wrong but on the "flow of information" concept, well after the wasp was produced and had probably ceased production, there were articles in the e.m. publications about using the cmos inverters in unusual ways. two i recall are a vca published in "polyphony" magazine and one more about general use of the cmos inverters with an eye to filters from "electronotes" written by hal chamberlain ( i think. have to dig out the article to be sure ). so, these ideas have been "in the air" since the mid-80`s. notwithstanding, if you designed the circuit used you should get credit and at least be paid for your design but if it is a "reverse engineering" job, a "clean room design" or just someone stumbling over something already done and forgotten about and resurrecting it, what then? were i to design a vcf using cmos inverters, am i automatically taking advantage of you? ideas and implementations have to be carefully considered here and due respect given to all parties concerned. that is my sole concern here, not bashing anyone. thanks for listening..... best, dave v.
Message
Re: [motm] Wasp and EMS Filters
2000-11-23 by davevosh@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.