MOTM

I concur with both of these.

At 03:23 PM 08/24/2000 -0000, "Dave Bradley" <daveb@...> wrote:
>1. As CV increases, time increases (slower)

At least (almost) everyone seems to be in complete agreement on this!
(After all, it has been labeled "time" CV, not "frequency"/"rate" CV)

>2. Larry is correct on the jack. You can add external reversible 
>attenuators later, or use ones already on your MOTM filters, but you 
>can never add the trigger out jack, so build it in.

Exactly!  Running the EG output through an inverter or the
reverse-attenuating input of the module it's controlling is no problem;
getting an end trigger out of an EG that doesn't have a trigger out jack is
next to impossible without mods.

	-Doug
	 ceres@...

>Moe
>
>--- In motm@egroups.com, "J. Larry Hendry" <jlarryh@i...> wrote:
>> HA HA.  The first two responses took opposite directions.  Just 
>goes to show
>> you will not be able to please all.  However, you certainly have a 
>great
>> looking product.
>> 
>> My vote:  Jack selection - Trigger out.  NOT because I have any 
>idea how I
>> would use that exactly right now.  I might actually use "-out" more 
>often.
>> BUT, that function is available simply using a reversing attenuator 
>from
>> your system.  There is no way to get trigger out unless it is built 
>into the
>> modules (we never say "no" way).  Now, to throw a kink in it all, I 
>will say
>> that the EG graphic is now so small, I would ditch it.  Use the 
>space for
>> the extra jack and put them both on.
>> 
>> TCV - I agree with DaveVosh.  More voltage = slower.
>> 
>> Larry Hendry
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Jeffrey Pontius <jpont@k...>
>> Jack = OUT-  definitely
>> TCV direction = either way
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: <davevosh@a...>
>> Jack = i think the "trigger out" function would be more useful.
>> TCV = my "vote" is for longer segment times ( slower - ? )
>>            with increasing control voltages.