That's a good idea!!! I'll try to add it. I would like this to ship in the *near* future!! :) Tony > -----Original Message----- > From: microtonal@... [mailto:microtonal@...] > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 6:16 AM > To: motm@egroups.com > Subject: RE: [motm] 3rd version panel layout > > > In step sequencer mode, since the "time" knobs don't > really have any other function, would they set the glide > rate between steps? > > John Loffink > microtonal@... > > Yes they are the 3/4" knobs. The square position does imply the > transitions > > are instant. Your interpretation is exactly correct. I still > have to decide > > the "polarity" or "order" (if you will) of the Time and Level > knobs. I'll > > use arbitrary values in the following examples just for sake of > argument. > > Time1 = 5 seconds > > Level1 = 25% > > Time2 = 1 second > > Level2 = 50% > > Time3 = 9 seconds > > Level3 = 100% (fully clockwise) > > ... > > > > > > One way of interpretation is that the module receives a gate and waits 5 > > seconds before it snaps to Level1 (at the 25% position). It > then sits there > > for 1 second before snapping to Level2. It sits at Level2 for 9 seconds > > before snapping to Level3, etc... > > > > The other way is to reverse the Time and Level and do it like this: > > > > Receive the gate, instantly go to Level1 for 5 seconds, then > snap and stay > > at Level2 for 1 second, then snap and stay at level 3 for 9 > seconds, etc. > > > > Either way, Time8 has no real meaning. > > > > > > Tony > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: J. Larry Hendry [mailto:jlarryh@...] > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 8:08 PM > > > To: motm@egroups.com > > > Subject: Re: [motm] 3rd version panel layout > > > > > > > > > Since the numbers were removed from the tick marks, the smaller > > > knobs don't > > > really seem to be so squeezed. Are these the 3/4" knobs as > opposed to the > > > 1" ones that Paul uses? I have some of these 3/4 knobs (same > style) on my > > > PAiA vocoder and they are O.K. For having so much on a 2U panel, > > > I do very > > > much like the way you have it laid out. Very intuitive. > > > > > > Let me ask a couple of questions about function. First, I liked the > > > suggestions that Crow had about the step function and I see you > > > included it. > > > I also liked his alternate solution for the term "shape." > "Slope" seems > > > somewhat accurate if I understand it. I guess I am clear on the > > > linear and > > > expo positions on the switch. However, I guess I am a bit > confused by the > > > square position. Does this mean that the transitions are > > > instant? In that > > > case does the time dial then determine the length of each > state as opposed > > > to the time it takes to get from one to another? > > > > > > I have to admit, the more I look at this, the more I like it > Tony. Great > > > job. I could see one or two of these in my MOTM cabinet. I > also have to > > > admit that the idea of a manual gate pushbotton is attractive, > > > but it would > > > certainly not be a purchase yes/no decision for me. Once could always > > > manually trigger from the gate, right? Of course, if you > want to have an > > > input at the gate and manually trigger, then it gets a little messy. > > > > > > Larry Hendry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Message
RE: [motm] 3rd version panel layout
2000-08-24 by Tony Karavidas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.