Dave Bradley wrote:
>A STUDLY lag processor has separate rise and fall controls, ANDIf Paul thinks it's feasible, I'd like to cast my vote for a STUDLY version! I realize that it most likely wouldn't fit on a 1U module, and that the costs would rise (exponentially also, ha-ha?) but the extra control would really be worth it! Anybody else feel the same way?
>allows you to vary the response from linear to exponential (as in the
>Emu design).