Sure, 30-40 seconds easy! Paul S. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathan Alan Hunsicker" <nate@...> To: <motm@egroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 5:35 PM Subject: Re: [motm] lag processor question... > and if remember correctly, i don't think the 820 lag has a lag time as > high as 30 seconds. I think it was around 5 sec or shorter. -Nate > > jwbarlow@... wrote: > > > Damn! This patch won't work in the way I described since the 820 > > appears to > > have no HOLD input (a gate input which holds the output constant > > regardless > > of the input). You'd have to have another S/H in front of the VC LAG > > input in > > order to keep the input from changing (and the output slowly following > > that > > input). > > > > Now it's getting expensive! > > JB > > > > In a message dated 6/20/2000 1:27:38 PM, jwbarlow@... writes: > > > > >Now another idea for the 820 LAG PROCESSOR module: > > >1) Take a CV source to the input of the 820 (e.g., noise). > > >2) Take the 820 output to the input of the 100 (or 101) S/H. > > >3) Take the 100 output to a CV input (say a 1v/oct of an oscillator). > > > > >4) Set the lag time to be rather long (like say a 5 octave sweep in > > thirty > > > > > >seconds). > > >5) Set the S/H level all the way up. > > > > > >This great patch (which I learned from the old Serge manual) keeps > > step > > >size > > >small but allows for a full 10V peak to peak swing for the total > > voltage > > > > > >output over time. This means that (in the patch example given above) > > any > > >two > > >adjacent notes must be close together, but over time a full ten > > octaves > > >would > > >be covered. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get 6 months of FREE* MSN Internet access! > http://click.egroups.com/1/5725/5/_/529958/_/961540368/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >
Message
Re: [motm] lag processor question...
2000-06-20 by Paul Schreiber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.