Damn! This patch won't work in the way I described since the 820 appears to have no HOLD input (a gate input which holds the output constant regardless of the input). You'd have to have another S/H in front of the VC LAG input in order to keep the input from changing (and the output slowly following that input). Now it's getting expensive! JB In a message dated 6/20/2000 1:27:38 PM, jwbarlow@... writes: >Now another idea for the 820 LAG PROCESSOR module: >1) Take a CV source to the input of the 820 (e.g., noise). >2) Take the 820 output to the input of the 100 (or 101) S/H. >3) Take the 100 output to a CV input (say a 1v/oct of an oscillator). >4) Set the lag time to be rather long (like say a 5 octave sweep in thirty > >seconds). >5) Set the S/H level all the way up. > >This great patch (which I learned from the old Serge manual) keeps step >size >small but allows for a full 10V peak to peak swing for the total voltage > >output over time. This means that (in the patch example given above) any >two >adjacent notes must be close together, but over time a full ten octaves >would >be covered.
Message
Re: [motm] lag processor question...
2000-06-20 by jwbarlow@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.