Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] Tibits from the closet

2000-06-13 by Paul Schreiber

Labor. These were all hand built. The Sennheiser used hand-matched filter
sections.

Back then, it was almost impossible to get 1% caps except in a few values.
And, they were huge!

You didn't have op amps (or if you did, they didn't have high gain-bandwidth
product) so
the "actual" versus "theoretical" filter calulation would be 15%-25% off. I
vaguely remember
reading 1 Sennheiser vocoder took 1 technician like 3 weeks to tune up.

Paul S.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Hunsicker" <nate@...>
To: <motm@egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 7:57 AM
Subject: Re: [motm] Tibits from the closet


> >3) If you think $2500-2000 is alot for a vocoder, the EMS one (1977 price
> >list) was $20,450!!
> >
> >That's 6.85 new Corvettes!!
> >
> >Paul S.
>
>
> What exactly make a vocoder so expensive? I mean $20,000+ in 1977, Even if
> all the components were made of gold, how could you justify a cost like
> that? The coveted Sennheiser was even more (I think). I can understand I
> high price (it includes filters, envelope followers and vca's for each
> band) but $20,000? Is that all in R&D? -Nate
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> @Backup- Protect and Access your data any time, any where on the net.
> Try @Backup FREE and recieve 300 points from mypoints.com Install now:
> http://click.egroups.com/1/5467/5/_/529958/_/960901274/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.