Labor. These were all hand built. The Sennheiser used hand-matched filter sections. Back then, it was almost impossible to get 1% caps except in a few values. And, they were huge! You didn't have op amps (or if you did, they didn't have high gain-bandwidth product) so the "actual" versus "theoretical" filter calulation would be 15%-25% off. I vaguely remember reading 1 Sennheiser vocoder took 1 technician like 3 weeks to tune up. Paul S. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathan Hunsicker" <nate@...> To: <motm@egroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 7:57 AM Subject: Re: [motm] Tibits from the closet > >3) If you think $2500-2000 is alot for a vocoder, the EMS one (1977 price > >list) was $20,450!! > > > >That's 6.85 new Corvettes!! > > > >Paul S. > > > What exactly make a vocoder so expensive? I mean $20,000+ in 1977, Even if > all the components were made of gold, how could you justify a cost like > that? The coveted Sennheiser was even more (I think). I can understand I > high price (it includes filters, envelope followers and vca's for each > band) but $20,000? Is that all in R&D? -Nate > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > @Backup- Protect and Access your data any time, any where on the net. > Try @Backup FREE and recieve 300 points from mypoints.com Install now: > http://click.egroups.com/1/5467/5/_/529958/_/960901274/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >
Message
Re: [motm] Tibits from the closet
2000-06-13 by Paul Schreiber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.