It takes 1 of 2 approaches to replace a pot with a cv, based on the situation. 1. replacing a pot that just provides a control voltage in the first place - no problem, you just tap into the summing amp with an input. 2. replacing an arbitrary pot that carries signal, for example the resonance pot on a filter - you have to replace the pot with a simple VCA, so it's nontrivial. Dave Bradley Principal Software Engineer Engineering Animation, Inc. daveb@... > -----Original Message----- > From: David Bivins [mailto:dbivins@...] > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 12:36 PM > To: motm@egroups.com > Subject: RE: [motm] silly question > > > I see your point, but-- > > Don't you already have voltage control over frequency on your 420s?! You > should have three inputs that will control the cutoff frequency > via voltage, > labeled: 1V/OCT, FM1, and FM2. What you *don't* have is voltage > control over > resonance amount. You do get that (as well as cutoff control) on the 440. > > I don't know the technical answer to your question, but having > asked similar > questions on AH awhile back and getting learned responses from > the likes of > Kevin Lightner and probably Paul too, the answer is no. With some circuits > it might be a simple matter, with others, not a simple matter. So there > would be no "generic" approach that would work. > > David. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nathan Alan Hunsicker [mailto:nate@...] > > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2000 8:29 PM > > To: MOTM Newsgroup > > Subject: [motm] silly question > > > > > > Is there any simple circuit that could be made to permit voltage control > > over any pot? My question probably doesn't make much sense, and with my > > limited electrical knowledge, I probably won't explain it very well > > either. What I was thinking of was a circuit designed to simulate a > > pot. A simple circuit with a CV in, a CV attenuator, and 3 wires to > > replace the pot, 2 to provide a constant resistance and one to vary > > according to CV. This would be a simple solution to those of us who want > > voltage control over the freq. on their MOTM-420's or the wet/dry > > control on a spring reverb. Maybe I'm out of my mind here, and this is > > an impossibility, but it's worth throwing out. Let me know if it's > > possible or if it would involve too much circuitry. -Nate > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Calling all Jazz fans. Check out DownBeatJazz.com's Digital Downloads > > section where you can download free mp3s. If you're a musician, upload > > your songs to DownBeatJazz.com for a chance to get reviewed by Down > > Beat Editors! > > http://click.egroups.com/1/2142/3/_/529958/_/956024824/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Your high school sweetheart-where is he now? With 4.4 million alumni > already registered at Classmates.com, there's a good chance you'll > find her here. Visit your online high school class reunion at: > http://click.egroups.com/1/3139/3/_/529958/_/956071955/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >
Message
RE: [motm] silly question
2000-04-18 by Dave Bradley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.