I thought the bypass switch was going to be a short-to-ground type. I'd rather see a +5V switch simple b/c it would be interesting to see the effects of feeding an LFO into the bypass jack. Maybe I'm wrong, let me know -Nate> > > >> (I know it's just me, but I find that the labeling of the "Bypass" switch > >> causes me to do a double-take. Kind of like a 'double-negative' thing.) > >> > > > >No, it's not just you! I had some difficulty coming to what the box graphic > >around the switch should say. Here's the reasoning chain which eventually > >allowed me to sleep peacefully: > > > >1. The BYPASS jack is clearly and correctly labelled, e.g. a signal or gate > >at that input causes the 820 to go into bypass mode. > > > >2. The switch does the same thing, and it's probably just a 5V signal > >normalled to the jack, I'm guessing. > > > >3. Controls with the same function as inputs should be labelled the same. > > > >At any rate, the nasty red led will come on when it's bypassed, so it should > >be pretty evident what state it's in. > > > >Dave Bradley > >Principal Software Engineer > >Engineering Animation, Inc. > >daveb@... > > > > > > > >
Message
RE: [motm] MOTM-820 VC Lag - Preview
2000-04-04 by Nathan Hunsicker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.