> Well, theres been abunch of talk on AH about the pros and cons of all the > available Modulars out there today. And as I expected, us MOTMites were the > most loyal, with a bunch of us sticking up for Paul's baby.. Only Serge and > Wiard got any type of support besides MOTM, and the support for these was > minimal. Thanks for posting. Over 2300 folks read these messages (OK, they *receive* them). > after looking around, ive come to the conclusion that in the world of > modulars, Serge and MOTM are at the ends of the spectrum. They are my two > favorites also.. MOTM with its great easy interface, big open layout and > separate, very modular design, with most modules being very specific, leading > to clear thinking.. > And Serge with its very dense, use upon use small layout leading to much > unpredictability and weirdness. I have nothing against Serge, except no documentation (ie schematics) and Rex still scraping the lettering off CA3280s like no one remembers how to read Electronotes or do patent searches. Sheesh. > Now if Paul would just ship my kits so I could look at modules instead empty > space through the rails... : ) I'm staying up late kitting up some '320s. > Anyone else intimidated by the past posts concerning the DOMOAS...memory, > displays, data wheels aaaah!! I just want sequential cv's&gates!! what > happened to the relatively plane jane MOAS?? It *has* CV/Gates. But the controller is a uP. MOAS was even crazier! Let's don't go there! (it used a USB backplane). > And why 3 spaces for a 5v supply, can't you regulate enough amperage at 5v > from 15v?? Just wondering.. Nope. Needs it's own. The VF display needs 400ma alone. Yee Haaaaaa!! Paul S. is it really 1:30AM??!? Nutz!!
Message
Re: [motm] King MOTM and other nonsense
2000-03-28 by Paul Schreiber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.