MOTM

Hi all, I love this list too! Keeps me moving with the modular.

For those who don't know, a company called Songworks.com (California 
company) make a spring reverb pedal called little lanilea or something 
similar. Retail direct from them is $149 plus $10 shipping last I checked. 
Check it out at gaspedal.com if nowhere else. They have sound files of it 
too. Just thought you all should know!

I am off the WMC at Miami today to spread my music and the MOTM gospel. Got 
25 catalogs from Paul and a lot of energy to spread the knowledge to my 
peers!  Wish me luck and a pair of sharp drinking eyes for all my time at 
the bar the next 5 days. Whoa boy...

Thomas White


>From: "Tkacs, Ken" <ken.tkacs@...>
>Reply-To: motm@onelist.com
>To: "'motm@onelist.com'" <motm@onelist.com>
>Subject: RE: [motm] Partial solution, or up your ante!
>Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:31:39 -0500
>
>
>I don't have enough filters yet to get that steep slope, but I've always
>intended on trying that to simulate a Frequency Shifter. Carlos credited 
>her
>Bode FS as being the source of her "Christmassy Sound," a shimmering
>non-harmonic detuning when mixed with the original signal.
>
>Using an old PC as an additive oscillator probably makes sense.... Hell, 
>you
>could probably use a MIDI/CV converter to send/receive MIDI continuous
>controller messages to control the partials. It's frustrating, though...
>wish it could just me a nice, black, 3u module.
>
>I've wondered if the Moog "Oscillator Driver" type of thing is a good idea,
>or was it just created as a compromise for the time.
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>From: 	jwbarlow@... [mailto:jwbarlow@...]
>Sent:	Thursday, 23 March, 2000 10:11 PM
>To:	motm@onelist.com
>Subject:	Re: [motm] Partial solution, or up your ante!
>
>OK, I was thinking of Ken's ideas (below), and would like to add a couple 
>of
>
>my own. But first, I think you've got an interesting idea about single side
>band shifting, have you tried taking a RM out and running it into about
>three
>or more 420s (or other VCFs)? I'd be interested in what you find. That 
>steep
>
>filter slope is what you'd need, but everyone hates it.
>
>The other idea I had (and have had for a long time) is quite digital, but
>has
>a certain similarity to Ken's second, additive, idea. We could use all 
>those
>
>stale old computers that are accumulating in everyone's garage as VC 
>digital
>
>oscillators. I imagine using the monitor to display harmonic amplitude of
>say
>the first 16 partials. One could specify the relationship between the
>harmonics (yeah Ken, you'd have to use a keyboard/mouse). I think such a
>system would be quite useful for some of the things that Ken mentions, and 
>I
>
>think the display would (as Ken intimated earlier) be much more intuitive
>than the typical display/draw the waveform type.
>
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com