Hi Paul n All ! I'd go for the 2u design, more functionality that way . Can't see what the "wave" knob does on your last proposal . On the trimmer : with one extra hole in the pcb, many multiturns could be accomodated, a single turn in the kit would do . This way the builder has a choice . I'd like to see two sync modes : one a hard reset, another one a reversal, like on the cem3340 . Might open the door to lots of weird control waveforms . (Only do-able if the osc is based on a triangle i guess) One more useful extra could be a gate input to start and stop the lfo (full cycles), same could be used for a one shot, maybe even giving counted bursts, with an external counter . I'm not too crazy about "zero on top" controls . Unless a generous zero deadband is included, one cannot be sure no voltage seeps through . The alternative would be a separate input, switch or a pull-to-invert knob ... Later . Keep 'em oscillating :) Hugo =
Message
Re: Vote for VCLFO design!
1999-05-04 by Hugo Haesaert
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.