Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: Vote for VCLFO design!

1999-05-04 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx

Hi Paul:

I can't decide which is better (2U or 1U). I was thinking that maybe you 
could make one PCB for both configurations with two different: panels, 
manuals, parts packages, etc..

Everything else sounds great though! 

John B.
Even if that LED is driven by the tri through its own amplifier?

In a message dated 5/3/99 3:17:30 PM, synth1@... writes:

>Well, the early voting favored the 1U, but the 2U faction has come on
>
>strong!
>
>
>
>Actually, a 2U is looking better since originally I thought I could fit
>all
>
>of the circuitry
>
>on the smaller pcb (ie MOTM-800 size) but that's not going to happen!
>
>
>
>If we can get Dave Tr. away from his MOTM-300 kits, perhaps he can gen
>up a
>
>front
>
>panel shot.
>
>
>
>Maybe:
>
>
>
>
>
>LED                FREQ
>
>
>
>CVMOD         WAVE
>
>
>
>RANGE          SHAPE
>
>
>
>                       SHAPE CV MOD
>
>
>
>
>
>1V/O     CVIN   SHAPE IN  SYNC
>
>SINE     TRI       RAMP   PULSE
>
>
>
>
>
>8 jacks, 4 pots, 1 LED, 1 rotary switch, 1 toggle switch, 2U wide
>
>
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.