Hi Paul: I can't decide which is better (2U or 1U). I was thinking that maybe you could make one PCB for both configurations with two different: panels, manuals, parts packages, etc.. Everything else sounds great though! John B. Even if that LED is driven by the tri through its own amplifier? In a message dated 5/3/99 3:17:30 PM, synth1@... writes: >Well, the early voting favored the 1U, but the 2U faction has come on > >strong! > > > >Actually, a 2U is looking better since originally I thought I could fit >all > >of the circuitry > >on the smaller pcb (ie MOTM-800 size) but that's not going to happen! > > > >If we can get Dave Tr. away from his MOTM-300 kits, perhaps he can gen >up a > >front > >panel shot. > > > >Maybe: > > > > > >LED FREQ > > > >CVMOD WAVE > > > >RANGE SHAPE > > > > SHAPE CV MOD > > > > > >1V/O CVIN SHAPE IN SYNC > >SINE TRI RAMP PULSE > > > > > >8 jacks, 4 pots, 1 LED, 1 rotary switch, 1 toggle switch, 2U wide > > > >
Message
Re: Vote for VCLFO design!
1999-05-04 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.