MOTM

I wanted to make a seperate module which could be bypassed if it was not
desired. Something that would go inline between the cv controller and the
osc. -Nate

> From:
>Nathan Hunsicker <nate@...>
>
>
>I was thinking more along the lines of easy switching of single oscillators
>
>during a stage performance. I didn't want to modify the 300VCO, it's
>
>perfect the way it is, my only problem is having to retune one oscillator
>
>if i want to feed two off the same cv and drop one of them 1 or 2 octaves.
>
>-Nate
>
>
>
>> From:
>
>>ivancu@...
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>In a message dated 3/16/2000 6:22:36 AM, davevosh@... writes:
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>><< the single thing i hate the most about my doepfers  vco`s are the "range"
>
>>
>
>>( octave) switches. a stable, wide range vco is limited  by their addition,
>
>>
>
>>IMHO. yes, they make conventional pitch / note music easier but the whole
>
>>
>
>>idea of voltage control is freedom. >>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>AGREED!  The octave switching should be on the controller-end, not at the
>
>>
>
>>VCO.  That way us "alternative controller" guys who don't think along the
>
>>
>
>>lines of keyboards aren't limited.
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>Somewhere along the line somebody made a compromise choice and decided to use
>
>>
>
>>a keyboard to control a synthesizer.  But a synthesizer inherently is not a
>
>>
>
>>keyboard instrument.  If you keep thinking along the keyboard paradigm you
>
>>
>
>>end up where MIDI is at, where it is very difficult to continuously play
>
>>
>
>>"between the keys".  This is very limiting and instead of expanding the
>
>>
>
>>electronic music universe, attempts to constrain it.
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>Ok, rant off.
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>Ivan
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>