Hi Paul, and Happy New Year! I feel the opposite; I always have envelopes dedicated to VC resonance. Using an LFO to slowly modulate VC resonance during a sequence creates a wonderfully evolving effect. Robert Rich has beautifully used sequenced VC to control the VC resonance on some of his pieces. In fact, VC Resonance is probably one of the top 3 modulation destinations in synthdom, in my opinion. VC resonance is a must have for me. Take care Jim Culver City, CA, USA Sent from my iPhone On Jan 24, 2014, at 9:40 PM, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote: > Thinking ahead to new filter designs....... > > Both the '440 and '480 have VC Resonance inputs. But, and let's be honest: > are they *used* all that much? One filter more than the other? > > Doing this adds cost/board space that I could use elsewhere. > > The only patch that comes to mind is adding a Velocity to Res, so that the > harder you play, the more resonance you have. But I think 95% of modular > owners do not 'play' them that way. > > Thoughts? > Paul S. > /note this is cross-posted several places, if you are a synth nerd you will > see it multiple times > >
Message
Re: [motm] VC Resonance: is it that useful?
2014-01-25 by Jim Cowgill
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.