In a message dated 00-01-30 15:20:32 EST, you write: << Who's up for VC, bigger than ADSR (or the on-the-horizon DADSR) EGs? Speak up! David Bivins PS--does anyone else here struggle almost daily with the urge to sell almost all non-modular gear to fund more modular gear? Tough life ;) >> david, i`d certainly like to see something along the lines of a more complex multi-segment contour generator than the normal (d)adsr. if you are into some serious d.i.y., i recall that electronotes had published n article on an "articulating contour generator" that let you add more complex transients. of course, you can always use the approach of using a sequencer and adjustable slew limiter as a kludge for doing more complex envelopes, too. still, even i`m forced to admit that for about 80 % of the fooling around i do, adsr`s or summed, delayed adsr`s cover things. this is an area thats waiting for a good idea and implementation to bring it all together and make us move on from our normal adsr`s. one other point, sometimes, complex isn`t better and i`ve found lots of cases where a simple attack only or decay only slope has been useful. s**** has in the past or currently explored this and d****** has a decay only unit available at a very reasonable price. best, dave p.s. - i know the "sell" feeling but at this point beyond my base modular, i have only a casio cz101 and a miracle keyboard and i seriously doubt that either has any intrinsic value. i do find them both useful, however, in the roles they serve for me.
Message
Re: VC EGs
2000-01-31 by DAVEVOSH@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.