MOTM

On 4/28/10 10:07 AM, jwbarlow@... wrote:

> I don't think I agree with the dichotomy below.
> IIRC, one of Paul's "visions" for MOTM was a complete (self contained,
> all inclusive) system, and not just a partial supplement to various
> other module brands.
> IIRC, the "alternative" modules to supplement MOTM were more the terrain
> of Oakley, Blacet, Encore, Stooge, etc.; MOTM was designed to be the
> "meat and potatoes" of its own 5U system.

I have modules from 8 different manufacturers in my 5U system, and will 
probably end up having _12_ in the near future. No one out there offers 
a really "complete" system my needs. MOTM doesn't have a sequencer for 
example. But why make one when there's so many other options out there?