Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-14 00:02 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] Re: MOTM updtae/semi rant

2010-04-26 by Paul Schreiber

. But now I hear I invested in a company that is about to drop the 5U focus. 
Ouch man.

Where did I say this?

a) if you don't own any MOTM modules, then you still can get all the ones 
*everyone else has*.

b) .com has released like 3 new modules in 6 years. He is not exactly 
cranking out new stuff, either. The latest quantizer module is the first new 
one since the 960 sequencer stuff and that was 3-4 years prior.

c) there are still 4 new MOTM modules in the pipeline: The 102, the BPF, the 
CG and the MT. I'll bet these 4 will ship long before .com has 4 new ones to 
ship, unless I'm wrong. Then I'm wrong :)

After Paul H. had the disabling stroke, and I had to change jobs 
(unrelated), I had to drop the full kits. I figured: no Modcan kits, no .com 
kits, so why no MOTM kits so 'terrible'? But if it turns out that 99% of 
MOTM customers are *because* of the kits, then I guess I'm f-ed. But my 
*hope* is that it's because of the MOTM sound and build quality and although 
the kits were a big initial attraction, that alone is not just cause to no 
longer buy from be assembled, even if analog (ie the BPF).

It's a gamble, but it's all I can do at *this stage* in my life. Things in 
April 2010 are *vastly different* in my personal life than when I began in 
Feb. 1998. I may no longer be in 'MOTM heyday' but I am still here trying to 
make a go at it.

See my next post.

Paul S.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.