Nice pics Nate! I'm partial to #1 or #2. The graphics on #4 do help quite a bit. I think #1 and #2 are the most MOTM-like in that they offer something that is visably different from other solutions but it all boils down to what Paul wants to build... Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Alan Hunsicker [mailto:nate@...] > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 4:28 PM > To: motm@onelist.com > Subject: [motm] Multiple Pesonalities > > > From: Nathan Alan Hunsicker <nate@...> > > OK, so we're torn between normaling and switches and 3 or 4 > multiples. I'm > starting to come over to the normaling side. I've attached a > pdf of all the > options we could go with. On the 3 multiples idea I suggest > we put a bank > of 6 in the middle simply because 3 sets of 4 looks to empty and who > couldn't use more multiples. -Nate > > PS: this will be my last PDF, I promise!!! > > --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor > ---------------------------- > > Looking for the lowest refinance rate for your mortgage? > GetSmart.com can help. We'll help you find the loan you > need - quick, easy, and FREE click > <a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/GetSmartRefinance > ">Click Here</a> > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > > >
Message
RE: Multiple Pesonalities
2000-01-27 by Crawley, Eric
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.