Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-03 22:10 UTC

Message

RE: Multiple Pesonalities

2000-01-27 by Tkacs, Ken

This is good to see---thanks!

As you know, I'm partial to #4 for the sake of elegance and maximization of
panel space.

However, if we were to  go with switches, I like #2. The third one is an
interesting idea, but I think it would be hard to see-(never mind get your
fingers in there)---those switches. Doubly so for case #1. The patchcords I
use have something like 2.5" deep metal 'shanks' on them, and if the
switches were cramped in there too closely I think it would be awkward.

Just my $0.02.

_Be kind-Rewind_,

Ken


		-----Original Message-----
		From:	Nathan Alan Hunsicker [mailto:nate@...]
		Sent:	Thursday, January 27, 2000 4:28 PM
		To:	motm@onelist.com
		Subject:	[motm] Multiple Pesonalities



		OK, so we're torn between normaling and switches and 3 or 4
multiples. I'm
		starting to come over to the normaling side. I've attached a
pdf of all the
		options we could go with. On the 3 multiples idea I suggest
we put a bank
		of 6 in the middle simply because 3 sets of 4 looks to empty
and who
		couldn't use more multiples. -Nate

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.