Yes, I see what you mean. Differing starting assumptions-to me, I would view the module as one big multiple that can easily be 'broken' into splits by jacking into lower points on it. To me, it wouldn't be confusing because you would be adding that second input consciously. -----Original Message----- From: Crawley, Eric [mailto:esc@...] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 3:58 PM To: motm@onelist.com Subject: RE: [motm] Multiple Personalities From: "Crawley, Eric" <esc@...> Yes, I should read what I type. I had the "sense" of the normalled connection backwards in my message, sorry. I have no problem working with normalized plugs in a normal signal flow, as in the case of an ARP 2600 or other devices where I know I'm breaking just a single signal flow. In a multiple panel, it just seems really akward to me. From a human factors POV, I think the difference here is how we view a set of multiples. I view them as multiple sets so I would leave a switch, if one existed, in the "off" position by default. Whereas a normalled connection assumes the switch is "on", connecting the muiltiple mults together. So, the default is different. Does that make sense? I certainly can live with the normalized jack, if push came to shove (or is that slap to eye poke?) but I would find the switches more intuitive to my work mode....Just another subjective opinion.
Message
RE: Multiple Personalities
2000-01-27 by Tkacs, Ken
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.