Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-05 20:20 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] MOTM 650

2010-02-16 by Paul Schreiber

Do you have V1.3 (boots up in the LCD)?

This sounds like a V1.2 bug fixed in V1.3

If you have a PC, you can flash the V1.3 code over MIDI. If not, I will do it free, just for postage.

Paul S.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ti_ 
  To: James Elliott ; motm@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:06 AM
  Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM 650





  So...I've mentioned my plight a few times and never heard anyone else with the same problem so one last time...
  Does anyone else have problems using their 650 for 4 separate voices on 4 different MIDI channels?  i.e. 1 voice controlled by MIDI channel 1, voice 2 on MIDI channel 2, etc.?
  On mine voice 1 and 2 work fine, but 3 and 4 are all sorts of screwed up with weird interactions between them and only about 1 octave of usable scale before they start going bizarrely microtonal.
  I've got a more thorough discription of my woes if necessary, but i've yet to hear anyone complain of anything remotely like my issues.
  ~Tim 




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: James Elliott <johans121@...m>
  To: jdm@...; motm@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Tue, February 16, 2010 10:55:31 AM
  Subject: [motm] MOTM 650

    

  Jeffrey, are there any plans on releasing an update for the MOTM650? There are several bugs that should really be addressed. It kinda sucks that I paid $500 for a product that doesn't work as advertised. It was mentioned last fall that some of the bugs were already taken care of and that the new OS was in some kind of beta stage. What's the hold up? If it's a matter of time, there are a number of developers on this board who I'm sure would be willing to take over the responsibility of getting this crap fixed.

  -Jim






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
  To: MOTM List <motm@yahoogroups. com>; jdm@synthcom. com
  Sent: Tue, January 26, 2010 1:23:49 AM
  Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-650 bug reporting time


  Jeffrey, anything we can do to get this thing fixed? Can we buy the code from you for a couple cases of beer or something?

  -Jim




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
  To: MOTM List <motm@yahoogroups. com>
  Sent: Mon, January 25, 2010 10:15:49 PM
  Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-650 bug reporting time

    

  Paul, any news on the 650 bug fixes? If I'm not mistaken you mentioned that some of the fixes were already implemented back in August....

  -Jim




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
  To: MOTM List <motm@yahoogroups. com>
  Sent: Sat, September 19, 2009 2:31:31 PM
  Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-650 bug reporting time


  Need anymore beta testers?




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
  To: MOTM List <motm@yahoogroups. com>
  Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 6:04:03 PM
  Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-650 bug reporting time

    

  Damn it! I would volunteer to be a beta tester for this as I've been bitching about these bugs either privately to Paul or openly to this list over the last two years, however I'll be traveling over the next month so I won't be able to provide any input :(

  Anyway, it looks like the two issues I've run into are being addressed:
  1) Assert errors when sending CC's to the Aux outputs
  2) Hosed error when receiving on the external clock input

  I'm really looking forward to this release, Paul & Jeffrey. Other than the frustrations associated with the various bug's I've reported, I really do like the 650. The only reason why I haven't returned it was because I had faith that you two would try to get these issues ironed out :)

  Also, I understand that this is bug fixing time, however I had a thought (a 'feature' wet dream) and wanted to throw this out there....
  Would it be possible for the 650 to be able to transmit a clock pulse from the "ext clock" jack and have the pulses controlled by midi start/stop messages? I'm imaging a configuration where that jack could be configured to send or receive clock via a menu option. This would allow the 650 to gate a sequencer without sacrificing any of the other outputs (as well as syncing LFO's). That would be super duper handy; and not only that but also a gold medal to those who have remained faithful to the cause......

  -Jim




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@airmail. net>
  To: MOTM List <motm@yahoogroups. com>
  Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 9:27:17 PM
  Subject: [motm] MOTM-650 bug reporting time

    
  I have collected MOTM-650 bug reports over the years and sent them in as a 
  whole to Jeffrey so he can address them. In many cases, he is unable to 
  reproduce the error. The exception is CC message assignments to the AUX 
  outputs, that is currently fixed and he is testing that code right now.

  Things that people have reported in the past include:

  a) running a high rate clock into EXT CLK for the arpeggiators (like into 
  the audio range) will cause a lock-up

  b) scrolling the menus while receiving MIDI data will lock up

  c) external MIDI clock seems to run the arpeggiators at 1/2 speed

  The current firmware release is V1.3 that shows up when you power up the 
  device. If you re NOT on V1.3 (there should be nothing else, like RC1 or 
  V127) email me. There will be a new beta firmware version available in ~ 2 
  weeks. If you want to be a beta tester email me. Right now, the firmware 
  updater is XP only, Jeffrey thinks he has a Mac solution that will be ready 
  in time.

  So, I'm asking people with '650s to really pound on them this weekend/next 
  week, watch for any strange lockups and *write down* what happened and then 
  repeat it several times so he can also see it.

  Fixing the CC messages is a big plus, but I want to get everything quashed 
  in this release.

  Paul S.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.