Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] Re: 5U vs E350 differences

2009-10-23 by Jeff Laity

Yeah, I'd love a micro version if it was 1u.

On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:14 AM, torikoos wrote:

>
> I see an opportunity here to release a micro and an ultra version,  
> much like the current MOTM-300 and 310 .... the micro based on the  
> E-350, and the Ultra being the super duper version...
> Would that work?
>
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:
> >
> > > Has there been any discussion yet as to what features the "super-
> > > duper" version would have?
> > >
> >
> > What the super-duper would have different than the "standard"  
> version:
> >
> > a) 8 banks of wavetables instead of 3 (assuming we could generate  
> that
> > many!)
> > b) the wavetable length would be increased to 1024 or maybe 2048  
> samples
> > (from 256) which reduces high-frequency aliasing and allows more  
> 'fancy'
> > wavetables
> > c) USB port for adding your own wavetables (no, it's NOT a  
> sampler) or might
> > just have a '521 XPander connect to it to do the wavetable loading  
> (then
> > it's "free")
> >
> > I would guess that this version would be summer 2010 because of  
> the SW
> > involved. The HW is more like the MOTM-520 but the SW is more  
> involved, and
> > somebody would have to write the wavetable editor/uploader.
> >
> > Paul S.
> >


NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail\ufffdmay be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer\ufffdsolely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in\ufffdaccordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity. \ufffd
\ufffd

 


\ufffd

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.