Yeah, I'd love a micro version if it was 1u. On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:14 AM, torikoos wrote: > > I see an opportunity here to release a micro and an ultra version, > much like the current MOTM-300 and 310 .... the micro based on the > E-350, and the Ultra being the super duper version... > Would that work? > > --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote: > > > > > Has there been any discussion yet as to what features the "super- > > > duper" version would have? > > > > > > > What the super-duper would have different than the "standard" > version: > > > > a) 8 banks of wavetables instead of 3 (assuming we could generate > that > > many!) > > b) the wavetable length would be increased to 1024 or maybe 2048 > samples > > (from 256) which reduces high-frequency aliasing and allows more > 'fancy' > > wavetables > > c) USB port for adding your own wavetables (no, it's NOT a > sampler) or might > > just have a '521 XPander connect to it to do the wavetable loading > (then > > it's "free") > > > > I would guess that this version would be summer 2010 because of > the SW > > involved. The HW is more like the MOTM-520 but the SW is more > involved, and > > somebody would have to write the wavetable editor/uploader. > > > > Paul S. > > NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail\ufffdmay be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer\ufffdsolely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in\ufffdaccordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity. \ufffd \ufffd \ufffd
Message
Re: [motm] Re: 5U vs E350 differences
2009-10-23 by Jeff Laity
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.