MOTM

Good point!  I hadn't thought about that.  I should get the proverbial
double-eye-poke.  Although I'd still rather have 2x4+1x6 than 3x4.  ;)

--PBr

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Dave Bradley [SMTP:daveb@...]
> Sent:	Wednesday, January 26, 2000 12:19 PM
> To:	motm@onelist.com
> Subject:	[motm] Normalling
> 
> From: "Dave Bradley" <daveb@...>
> 
> To Normal or Not to Normal, that is the question...
> 
> The cool thing about Ken's idea is that it is easy for people who want
> that
> mult normalling to run a couple of wires and do it themselves, while other
> people who don't want normalling needn't be burdened with it.
> 
> I personally plan to end up with a system capable of 4 voice polyphony,
> and
> I intend to normal the crap out of it. Maybe even mount pin blocks over
> the
> jack fields on each module to make it easier to change normalling. It is
> of
> course the responsibility of the system owner to remember what they have
> done behind the panel!
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
> > From: "Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)" <PaulBr@...>
> >
> > Personally... I'm not too keen on part of that idea.  It would be FAR
> too
> > easy for me to forgetfully stick a socket in that upper-left and
> > wonder what
> > the hell was going on.  And it only gets worse when chaining...
> > Therefore,
> > I stick with my opinion that a 2x4+1x6 is keen, in a 1U package...  And
> > since we're apparently getting more power distributers on other modules,
> > well, no concern for that anymore.
>