Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Scheduling update/pots moving over to BTI

2009-04-16 by Paul Schreiber

[I'll have my expert panel of judges select the '730 contest winner by Sat. 
Pm, still only 2 people have entered and a 3rd person would spice things up 
a bit]

As previously predicted, my MOTM time in March/April has been limited. I am 
about 100% caught-up in 2.0 orders. I even managed to ship a few kits out 
last week :)

I am running about 15 assembled modules behind schedule where I thought I 
would be 8 weeks ago. Looking forward until the end of May, I'm still going 
to be about this much behind (it's just going to be a *different* set of 15 
modules). Between tomorrow and May 1st I will be able to ship between 10 and 
14 modules, which is 'light' due to my real job workload. The month of May 
will be *much* better for MOTM shipments, *including* more kits going out. I 
should be able to ship a minimum of 30 assembled modules in May which will 
drop the backlog to < 50 modules (including 2 recent, rather large orders).

The pc boards that Shane will be working on (in order) are:

'320
'410
'420
more '300s

while I am making some more '310s and '800s.

Bottom line: Things will continue to be slow until May, then I can ship 
quite a bit more through June. My goal is to have <25 modules left to ship 
by the end of June. My day job essentially shuts down the first 2 weeks of 
July, and that is traditionally when I really catch up and do R&D (last year 
at this time is when I did the '730 production CAD work).

Sometime this summer, I will be switching over to the BTI pots and moving 
away from Spectrol. The Spectrol pricing is getting silly (like $13ea). What 
I will do is "pace myself" based on the current log pots (still Spectrol), 
so that for example the '420, 440 and '480 VCFs that use 3 log pots and 1 
Spectrol pot on the pc board will still all be Spectrol until I just can't 
ship anymore. Modules like the '820, '190 and '490 will quickly be 100% BTI 
pots.

This brings up the issue of the VCOs. Yes, the cermet elements are the 
lowest drift and make sense in VCOs. So yes, I will use the 148 there as 
long as I have stock (I have about 175 left) but *eventually* these will 
also be BTI (which are conductive plastic). Will this cause future 
'300s/'310s to be unstable/unusable? Of *course not*. As far as I know, 
every other synth vendor uses carbon pots in their VCOs, and they are still 
being bought. MOTM VCOs will still exhibit the *lowest drift* of any VCO.

Remember, the shafts of the BTI pots will reduce the gap between the bottom 
of the knob to the front panel by about 0.040in. Which in reality, looks a 
bit nicer IMHO.

When I get low on the Spectrol 248J log pots, I will order equivalent log 
pots from BTI which are an *upgrade* IMHO from the Spectrols.

Paul S.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.