If you built a 320, you will do fine with a 300 in my opinion. The tracking takes a while to adjust. No scope required for that. A good ear to hear beating, something to compare it to, and patience will be your best tools. I found it was easier to do two at once that one at a time. However, I am now building my third, so I expect I might need to go back and tweak # 1 and 2 while adjusting # 3. I found that nothing I own is perfectly in tune when tracking up and down the keyboard. Not even the digital stuff. I agree with you 100% on the 320 LED. I was too pleasantly surprised. The extra dollars for that puppy on the LFO was worth every penny. Too cool. Larry H ---------- > From: Nathan Hunsicker <nate@...> > To: MOTM Newsgroup <motm@onelist.com> > Subject: [motm] MOTM-300 Question > Date: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 9:42 PM > > From: Nathan Hunsicker <nate@...> > > Hello all, just a few questions about the 300 VCO. Exactly how difficult > is this module? I worked for 2 years in robotics R&D so I know a good > amount. Is the difficulty in assembly or calibration? I don't have an > o-scope, is there any way i can get around getting one? (in a pinch I'll > borrow one) What is the difference between the 300 and the Micro VCO > expected later this year? Now that I've asked way too many questions, I > have one good thing to say, After reading through the 320 LFO manual, I > was expecting to see this incredibly dim LED, I was delightfully > surprised to see it is as bright as it is, more than bright enough for > my needs. -Nate (sitting under 2 feet of snow) >
Message
Re: MOTM-300 Question
2000-01-26 by J. Larry Hendry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.