MOTM

1) SEM (CV controlled morph - ummmm YEA!!!!!)
2) FFB (Only if it has CV Controlled bands)
3) Cloud




________________________________
From: Charles Stella <cstella@...>
To: MOTM List <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 9:50:38 AM
Subject: Re: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'


1. SEM
2. FFB
3. Cloud

Thanks!

Charles.



On Feb 16, 2009, at 4:30 PM, Paul Schreiber wrote:

After reading everyone's inputs for what is desired for a DIY/pc board only 
(or module, but all in old fashioned through-hole technology) I've decided 
to work on the SEM VCF with Voltage-Controlled Output Morphing.

For all you solder jockeys out there, it will be as complicated as the 
MOTM-480 VCF. But with *more* parts. Yippee.

In order to take advantage of all it can do, it will have 6 panel controls 
but 11 jacks. I plan to use a standard BR-1 bracket/MOTM pc board size 
*unless* the layout goes south and won't fit. It will be *very* dense.

There will be 2 audio inputs, voltage-controlled resonance and 
voltage-controlled output morphing (along with HP/BP/LP/Notch *fixed* 
outputs). The MORPH sweeps between HP/BP/LP on a dedicated output.

Even though it uses 'vintage' op amps, I just checked Digikey/Mouser and 
they have tons in stock. There are several LM13700 dual OTAs but again not 
an issue.

So, one last 'poll':

What would you rather see *first*:

a) some sort of FFB/parametric EQ boards?

b) the SEM VCF boards?

c) the Cloud Generator in all it's assembled SMT glory?

Paul S.



Charles Stella

http://www.charless tella.net

http://www.amygdalahijack. com

http://www.myspace. com/charlesstell a

http://www.myspace. com/amygdalahija ckmusic.com
  
cstella@mac. com