Hi , 1) FFB but only if it have CV I/Os on each bands... Else i will go do my own design... 2) Cloud Generator ...why not i seems to be an interesting /innovative module anyway ! but no DIY = ggrrr ;) not interested into the SEM VCF , to much simple to clone and over listened VCF .... I already designed a big one by the time for the (ex) AnalogLab french compagny ... It was the Xpass filterII , based on 13700 too to replace their first version who was made with CA3080 like the vintage , but never released because the compagny has sunk before ! Sorry Paul, but you are coming too late here for me... No flame indeed... I still love what you do :) Thanks Marc B. Paul Schreiber a \ufffdcrit : > After reading everyone's inputs for what is desired for a DIY/pc board only > (or module, but all in old fashioned through-hole technology) I've decided > to work on the SEM VCF with Voltage-Controlled Output Morphing. > > For all you solder jockeys out there, it will be as complicated as the > MOTM-480 VCF. But with *more* parts. Yippee. > > In order to take advantage of all it can do, it will have 6 panel controls > but 11 jacks. I plan to use a standard BR-1 bracket/MOTM pc board size > *unless* the layout goes south and won't fit. It will be *very* dense. > > There will be 2 audio inputs, voltage-controlled resonance and > voltage-controlled output morphing (along with HP/BP/LP/Notch *fixed* > outputs). The MORPH sweeps between HP/BP/LP on a dedicated output. > > Even though it uses 'vintage' op amps, I just checked Digikey/Mouser and > they have tons in stock. There are several LM13700 dual OTAs but again not > an issue. > > So, one last 'poll': > > What would you rather see *first*: > > a) some sort of FFB/parametric EQ boards? > > b) the SEM VCF boards? > > c) the Cloud Generator in all it's assembled SMT glory? > > Paul S. > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
Message
Re: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'
2009-02-17 by Marc Bareille
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.