Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-09 22:55 UTC

Message

RE: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'

2009-02-17 by Aardvark

For me it's

1) FFB

 

2) SEM VCF

 

3) Cloud Generator

 

I'll still be happy if the SEM was 1st. I'm just not sure I could justify
dropping 500 bucks on a Cloud Generator that I have no current use for.
Maybe if there were some super cool samples to demonstrate the it's
abilities and characteristics it might peek my interest!

 

Al

 

From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul
Schreiber
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 7:30 PM
To: MOTM List
Subject: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'

 

After reading everyone's inputs for what is desired for a DIY/pc board only 
(or module, but all in old fashioned through-hole technology) I've decided 
to work on the SEM VCF with Voltage-Controlled Output Morphing.

For all you solder jockeys out there, it will be as complicated as the 
MOTM-480 VCF. But with *more* parts. Yippee.

In order to take advantage of all it can do, it will have 6 panel controls 
but 11 jacks. I plan to use a standard BR-1 bracket/MOTM pc board size 
*unless* the layout goes south and won't fit. It will be *very* dense.

There will be 2 audio inputs, voltage-controlled resonance and 
voltage-controlled output morphing (along with HP/BP/LP/Notch *fixed* 
outputs). The MORPH sweeps between HP/BP/LP on a dedicated output.

Even though it uses 'vintage' op amps, I just checked Digikey/Mouser and 
they have tons in stock. There are several LM13700 dual OTAs but again not 
an issue.

So, one last 'poll':

What would you rather see *first*:

a) some sort of FFB/parametric EQ boards?

b) the SEM VCF boards?

c) the Cloud Generator in all it's assembled SMT glory?

Paul S.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.