d) MOTM-600 micro sequencer!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (of course, I realize I may be overly confident in assuming that Paul wont be motivated enough to actually throw a brick 'up hill' from Texas and hit me in the head in Washington! ;-) OK, out of the choices given and taking into account that I'm a filter junky: 1st - b) the SEM VCF boards The SEM filter's features sound really exciting to me and I would buy it without hearing it first since I trust in Paul to make an awesome sounding filter! Hopefully Synth Tech, Bride Chamber and / or Doug W. front panels will be easily obtainable? 2nd - a) some sort of FFB/parametric EQ boards I've wanted a FFB for a long time but my synth configuration plans have always been easily swayed by anything that becomes available that I think might be 'cooler'! (see above ;-) Here is a side note on the FFB concept. Paul has asked for some module that no one has available. One thing that has puzzled me is why there are no voltage controlled FFBs??? (at least as far as I've seen) I don't mean controlling the frequency, but just the amount, same as the knob does. I think you would be able to do some amazingly realistic vocal and acoustic instrument simulations with 2 to 8 FFB channels under computer or sequencer control and using random voltages, quantized or not, the possibilities for unique sound design seems vast! So maybe the MOTM FFB circuit board could just provide headers for an expansion panel? Seems like if you left out the low and high pass channels, you could take a stock 1U multiples panel and re-label it for the other 8 freq. range CV inputs and also provide direct outs for those same 8 channels. I'd love to have this, is it feasible??? If it was . . . I might want the FFB before the SEM VCF! ;-) 3rd - c) the assembled Cloud Generator While this one seems pretty cool to me, it really hasn't "grabbed" me very hard. I'm not sure why. Maybe I don't totally get the concept or I haven't heard a definitive sample yet? I always get excited when I read the explanations of modules like the Cloud Generator, or saw animators or the Zero oscillator etc but when I hear any of the samples I just sort of go "meh". Maybe it's primarily because I'm a percussionist first, but I'd much rather spend money on more sequencers, arpeggiators, pulse dividers and switchers etc (and of course filers!) John L Rice -----Original Message----- From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Schreiber Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 4:30 PM To: MOTM List Subject: [motm] Results of the 'user poll' After reading everyone's inputs for what is desired for a DIY/pc board only (or module, but all in old fashioned through-hole technology) I've decided to work on the SEM VCF with Voltage-Controlled Output Morphing. For all you solder jockeys out there, it will be as complicated as the MOTM-480 VCF. But with *more* parts. Yippee. In order to take advantage of all it can do, it will have 6 panel controls but 11 jacks. I plan to use a standard BR-1 bracket/MOTM pc board size *unless* the layout goes south and won't fit. It will be *very* dense. There will be 2 audio inputs, voltage-controlled resonance and voltage-controlled output morphing (along with HP/BP/LP/Notch *fixed* outputs). The MORPH sweeps between HP/BP/LP on a dedicated output. Even though it uses 'vintage' op amps, I just checked Digikey/Mouser and they have tons in stock. There are several LM13700 dual OTAs but again not an issue. So, one last 'poll': What would you rather see *first*: a) some sort of FFB/parametric EQ boards? b) the SEM VCF boards? c) the Cloud Generator in all it's assembled SMT glory? Paul S. ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
RE: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'
2009-02-17 by John L Rice
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.