MOTM

I would go for C then B then A.  But really they should be prioritized in terms of time to market.  

cheers,
eric f

--- On Mon, 2/16/09, Paul Schreiber <synth1@...> wrote:
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...t>
Subject: [motm] Results of the 'user poll'
To: "MOTM List" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Monday, February 16, 2009, 6:30 PM











    
            After reading everyone's inputs for what is desired for a DIY/pc board only 

(or module, but all in old fashioned through-hole technology) I've decided 

to work on the SEM VCF with Voltage-Controlled Output Morphing.



For all you solder jockeys out there, it will be as complicated as the 

MOTM-480 VCF. But with *more* parts. Yippee.



In order to take advantage of all it can do, it will have 6 panel controls 

but 11 jacks. I plan to use a standard BR-1 bracket/MOTM pc board size 

*unless* the layout goes south and won't fit. It will be *very* dense.



There will be 2 audio inputs, voltage-controlled resonance and 

voltage-controlled output morphing (along with HP/BP/LP/Notch *fixed* 

outputs). The MORPH sweeps between HP/BP/LP on a dedicated output.



Even though it uses 'vintage' op amps, I just checked Digikey/Mouser and 

they have tons in stock. There are several LM13700 dual OTAs but again not 

an issue.



So, one last 'poll':



What would you rather see *first*:



a) some sort of FFB/parametric EQ boards?



b) the SEM VCF boards?



c) the Cloud Generator in all it's assembled SMT glory?



Paul S.