MOTM

He wrote me and said the same thing. It sounds kind of cheesy but  
maybe we could send a group letter to the SW engineer and ask/plead  
that he release it. I think it is Paul's responsibility to get the SW  
going but that doesn't mean we can't help.





On Feb 3, 2009, at 8:35 PM, John Blacet wrote:

> ---A post from Paul a week or so ago states that he does not have  
> access
> to the code--very scary!
>
> > is the source to the 650 available?
> >
> > in the absence of the original author, maybe the community could  
> have
> > a go at fixing it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>So, is my request for a meaningful update just going to go ignored?
> >>
> >>Well, if 'update' means "something new to report", then there is no
> >> update.
> >>
> >>To spell it out:
> >>
> >>a) I did not write the code
> >>b) I do not have access to the code
> >>c) the person who has the code is aware of the problems, but has had
> >> ongoing
> >>health issues. I have emailed him several times, and gotten no  
> response.
> >>d) I have NO IDEA if, or when, a code update will happen
> >>e) I have taken corrective measures for future modules (both in HW  
> and
> >> SW)
> >>to assure this situation does not happen again
> >>f) if anyone is unhappy with any MOTM module, for any reason, just  
> email
> >> me.
> >>I will issue a refund *immediately* upon it's return.
> >>
> >>Paul S.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> John Blacet
>
>
>