Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] Filter recomendations?

2009-01-28 by Erik Ribeiro

The 485 is gritty and if you take it to follow the GX-1, the studio electronics crowd find it nasally and aggressive. I believe the GX-1 was their design inspiration for the NovaMusik CODE. But if I'm not mistake, it doesn't self-oscillate, so it might not meet your droning & doom metal needs. If the MOTM samples aren't good enough for you to evaluate, look for GX-1 samples or samples of the CODE from SE. You can also check out the samples of their CS-80 filter, which is also the design inspiration of the 480. It's another favorite. But I've never heard more people rave about the 440. Of course, I want them all, but I'm usually broke.

Erik




________________________________
From: Ross Stapf <pristak@...>
To: MOTM List <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 3:08:01 PM
Subject: [motm] Filter recomendations?


I'll need to pick up a MOTM format filter soon.  I have some in other formats, but none in 5U.  My favorates in the other formats are the Mankato I have in frac and the cwejman dual mode and livewire Frequensteiner in euro.  However I'm looking at finding something a little different for my MOTM format filter.  I've especially been looking at the MOTM 410 and the MOTM 440, but welcome any other suggestions as well.

I'm mostly doing Noise/Drone in my solo shows/recordings, and also playing with a Doom Metal band doing drones and Hawkwind like psychedelic sounds.

Ross Stapf
Cedar Hill TX

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.