a) I'm not going to change my company name, so forget that :) b) I have been doing "business" as Synthesis Technology since 1984. Not the *synthesizer* business, but business in other areas (at one time I designed DSP boxes for TI speech development). In 1996 I incorporated and so the true parent is SynthTech, Inc. Synthesis Technology is a wholly owned sudsidiairy. MOTM is a *brand name*, like Q-Tips or Clorox. c) I did in fact struggle with the naming convention for Frac. Do I 'dilute' the MOTM brand? So I did a compromise: they are still MOTM but there is a different series (the '1000 Series'). They are still *made* by Synthesis Technology. At the *time* I had no plans for additional formats. Now, I am pondering that. d) So, why does SynthTech appear on a few MOTM modules. Answer: so it *fits* on the panel :) e) So, why does SynthTech, Inc appear on Pro Forma Invoices (for overseas VAT)? Because that *is* my "official" corporate name. And I have to use that on Export documents. f) Part of the reason the logo change is needed is that if/when I got to a 3rd/4th/...format, I will not call these MOTM but the generic 'Synthesis Technology' brand and will have a different number scheme as well. g) So, why is website/official name SynthTech and not Synthesis Technology? Because that is the name of a mdical supply company ans in Texas, you can only have 1 company name registered at a time. So I "cheat" and use a subsidiary with the same name (allowed). h) Sorry but the real 2.0 rollout was a 'dud' in the sense it was not - the end of kits needed to be shipped - the new modules were not ready and I did not have stock built up for faster shipping - the new website was not ready I suppose now it's '2.0 Beta Release 1' (shrug). Paul S.
Message
Re: [motm] MOTM 2.0 ... new name.
2008-12-09 by Paul Schreiber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.