Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-09 22:55 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] Brass sounds (One Word Filter Descriptions)

2008-08-25 by Henrik

Thanks for your reply.

Ok, that surprises me a bit. I thought that most synth brass was LP, like Oberheim OB polysynths for example, which does´nt have BP or HP and despite that they´re known for their brass sounds.

/H

--- On Mon, 8/25/08, thomas white wrote:
From: thomas white
Subject: Re: [motm] Brass sounds (One Word Filter Descriptions)
To: sequenrik@..., motm@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 11:29 PM

480 is a lowpass, or a highpass, or a bandpass
depending on how you set the knobs. For brass I do set
it as a bandpass with a little highpass, and more
lowpass for the muted tones.

The 480 is a filter I didn't think I would use much at
first. I was turned off by the lack of
self-oscillation, but have since realized this was
stupid on my part. The dual filter sections ring very
nicely (and sometimes quite rudely) with the right
frequency settings. You can really get a thick
response from the 480. I didn't expect to like it so
much.

There is a bit of noise, as is expected with vintage
clone-types like the CS-80 circuit. Nothing too bad
and certainly worth it in the long run. Overall a very
nice compliment to the range.

Here are my one-word descriptions of the MOTM filters
(IMHO) -

410 - "Rubbery" (Listen to Robert Rich Bestiary and
you'll have to buy a 410 just to get through the day
from then on)

420 - "Glassy" (two in series, tuned with some
resonance provides amazing tones)

440 - "Smooth" (my favorite overall, Bass x 10,000)

480 - "Brassy" (But much more than that too)

485 - "Rugged" (and I mean dragging clean white
laundry through the mud kind of dirty)

490 - "Classic" (no question, Moog tone all the way)

Hope this helps. Maybe others can chime in here.

Thomas

--- Henrik <sequenrik@yahoo. com> wrote:

> Thanks or reply.
> The 480 is a bandpass vcf, but do you set it to LP
> to get a good brass?
>
> --- On Mon, 8/25/08, thomas white
> <djthomaswhite@ yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: thomas white <djthomaswhite@ yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [motm] Brass sounds
> To: motm@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 10:25 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 480 for brass all the way. 440 is
> amazing too. If I
>
> had to chose one for overall usefulness I would
> choose
>
> 440. 410 is more like the resonators on the Korg PS
>
> series. Imagine a triple band pass filter with three
>
> tuned frequencies. No brassiness at all in there....
> I
>
> would say it is great for breathy, windy patches
>
>; similar to a triple wah pedal in a way.
>
>
>
> Hope this helps!
>
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> --- Henrik wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > Of you who use different MOTM-filters, from which
>
> > one of them do you create your favourite brass
>
> > sound? I´m not surprised if the 440 and 480 would
> be
>
> > favoured, but how is the 410? I have´nt heard many
>
> > people mention it at all.
>
> >
>
> > I´d appreciate samples.
>
> > Thanks
>
> >
>
> > Henrik
>
> >;
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
>
>
> Thomas White
>
> Natural Rhythm
>
> www.naturalrhythmmu sic.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Thomas White
Natural Rhythm
www.naturalrhythmmu sic.com


Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.