Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re:MOTM-compliant modules now...to Mr Suit&Tie...

2008-04-30 by earthtodylan2000

Mr. S&T

Hmmm... They sound like they would fit better in a Moog system then.

When I was asking about MOTM format I should of kept it to the paint, knobs. Jack grids 
get a pass in my book.

Is the "MOTM compliant" modules the same for .com systems as well?

Dave

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Scott_Stone
http://www.myspace.com/sirdsssound
 




--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Suit & Tie Guy <erwill@...> wrote:
>
> On Apr 30, 2008, at 3:40 PM, earthtodylan2000 wrote:
> > exciting in the world of MOTM. I've been checking out yr. modules  
> > over the last year or so
> > and they look rad.
> 
> thanks very much.
> 
> >  I was wondering just how close the panels are to the MOTM  
> > format...does the paint match
> > Paul's?
> 
> these panels are manufactured using a photo-aluminum process nearly  
> identical to the Moog systems on the 1960s, and therefore do not use  
> any paint in the manufacturing process. it is an anodised aluminum  
> finish whose artwork is rated to over 10 years of direct solar  
> radiation and as such is certified for exterior legending on the  
> International Space Station. outdoors on planet earth they wouldn't  
> fade for 60 years. if used indoors they will never fade, and the  
> artwork will never rub off .. though they can be scratched.
> 
> these are logistically MOTM-compliant: they fit in MOTM-19A rails  
> with 8-32 3/4" machine screws and use a 4-position MTA-156 header for  
> 15 volt power. they will not match for finish or fonts, and violate  
> the MOTM knobs-and-jacks grid.
> ---
> Suit & Tie Guy
> suitandtieguy.com
> stgsoundlabs.com
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.