MOTM

Scott Deyo
The Bridechamber
contact@...
www.bridechamber.com


On Oct 28, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Greg James wrote:

> I've bought some modules from Scott myself. And I heartily recommend
>  his services/items to everyone. I'll buy more from him if and when he
>  has new stuff I want.
>
>  Now having said that, Scott's panels are, by his own admission, close
>  but not exact. MOTM "format" is different from MOTM "look". In many
>  ways I prefer Brideschamber's "look". The font, for example, is easier
>  for me to read. But nevertheless, they are not as close to Paul's old
>  panels as Stooge's were (at least to my eyes).
>
>  Robert was asking for a "true" MOTM-esq panel, and as far as I can 
> see,
>  only Doug is on record for attempting to keep the Stooge "look" going.
>  But unfortunately he's been pre-occupied (the details of which I am 
> not
>  familiar - I'm only inferring from what he has posted on his web 
> site).
>  Months ago I sent him a huge list of panels I'd like to buy from him.
>  But that's been close to a year now.
>
>  (Hey Doug - if you're reading this, I hope your condition is not too
>  serious and you are getting better.)
>
>  I haven't seen one of Doug's panels yet, so I don't know how close his
>  will ultimately be. As soon as I get one, I'll know. In the meantime,
>  I'll have a chance to see one of Paul's new panels soon enough 
> (probably
>  in front of the Cloud Generator). Once I see the new "look," it might
>  turn out that Scott's panels are well within the variation range that
>  I'll have to learn to live with.
>
>  As an aside, I've got enough MOTM modules across several generations 
> to
>  verify differences in MOTM's own paint. It is really noticeable. I've
>  got some panels whose texture is a lot smoother than others. You can
>  really see the difference when they are side-by-side. Scott's paint
>  texture fits in the middle of the two extremes, and is more uniform.
>  The sputtering on Pauls panels can run from somewhat fine to quite
>  coarse. Scott's lettering font, however, is very different and very
>  apparent.
>
>  Those are my observations,
>  -Greg
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
>  Mark
>  Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 5:09 PM
>  To: MOTM litserv
>  Subject: RE: [motm] Looking for EFG-Deluxe panel
>
>  I think you are missing something. I don't know about Doug, but
>  Scott Deyo is currently producing a large number of panels in MOTM
>  format. In fact, this past week I received a panel and bracket for
>  the CGS Tube VCA based on a design I suggested in August. While the
>  font used for its lettering is slightly different, the paint looks
>  the same as the Stooge and Synthesis Technology panels. Even the
>  holes are painted. I'm very happy with it.
>
>  On 10/28/07, Greg James put forth:
>  >Am I missing something? As far as I know, neither Scott nor Doug have
>  >produced a MOTM/Stooge panel in at least a year. I know life has been
>  >taking a higher priority for these guys, but I think it's time we all
>  >just own up to the fact that new MOTM/Stooge panels are not going to
>  >happen anytime soon.
>  >
>  >Just to be clear, what I mean by MOTM/Stooge is replicating the paint
>  >and labeling as closely as possible. Not some "close" facsimile.
>
>  Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>  
>