> From: Andy Finch <andyfinch@...> > > The best thing for me about the 320 is how it brings to > life my other modules. You said a mouthful there Andy. I love PWM and the shape control on the 320 adds a new dimension to that whole process. > Now I can get those Sub Octaves switching in, and > simultaneously find myself in PWM heaven! It won't > be long before I'm ordering another. Oh yes. I ordered two to start with and can see how easily I could have two-per-voice in my MOTM system eventually. Since I have two now, I have to report that I am enjoying using one for a sub oscillator (via the syncing action I described in a previous post, and the second for a modulation source for both a 300 VCO and the other 320. Obviously, using the Pulse output of the "sub-osc" 320 and the shape in from the other you get great PWM from your 320 sub osc. I have a patch going on right now with one 300 VCO going through the 410 filter (lots of LFO internal action going there). The 410, a 320 sub osc, and my other 300 are all fed to the 420 filter. I am using the other 320 for modulation of the 300 going straight to the 420 and the other 320. I am in LFO heaven. I could do a bit more if I had that mixer thing. <snicker> > Finally, the one advantage about being in Europe and > having to wait that bit longer for our modules is that it > gives Larry the chance to debug the assembly process > AND come up with some interesting ways on how to > use it. Well, much of my debugging in life in general comes from screwing things up the first time through. As far as interesting ways to use it, I would really like to hear from the guys that are more modular savvy. This is my first. The only good thing about that is I am not constrained by doing anything correctly. Hell, I'm just learning. And, fortunately (or not depending on your perspective), I am not afraid to just spill it all out there and look stupid. Larry H.
Message
Re: 320 LFO
1999-12-20 by J. Larry Hendry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.