On 7/7/07, JH. put forth:
sure that getting it to work was quite an achievement, and it's short
delay time is uniquely impressive, imho, it's a bit too subtle for my
tastes. However, I would be be quite interested in a Roland
emulation dual-BBD PCB.
On 7/15/07, JH. put forth:
single units with 512 stages, there was the Reticon SAD512 (which
came in 8 and 16-pin versions), the Phillips TDA 1022 (16-pin), and
the Panasonic MN3002, MN3204, and MN3304 (all 8-pin, afaik). I don't
think there are any others. I have heard conflicting opinions on
whether or not the MN series can be used as direct replacements for
the Reticon chips.
>If there's enough interest, this could be a project for a future PCBI don't think I'd be interested in the scanner chorus. While I'm
>development. I wouldn't restrict this to Hammond emulation, but make a
>mono-in / stereo out device in the fashion of many Roland / Boss dual-BBD
>chorus circuits. Just without BBD. Let me know what you think ...
sure that getting it to work was quite an achievement, and it's short
delay time is uniquely impressive, imho, it's a bit too subtle for my
tastes. However, I would be be quite interested in a Roland
emulation dual-BBD PCB.
On 7/15/07, JH. put forth:
>Now, I know what BBD chip option #1 would be (I won't tell right now, forCurious, which BBD chips are currently in production?? As far as
>obvious reasons ...)
>
>Please let me know what you'd prefer as option #2. (Should *not* be another
>vintage / extinct specimen, but one of the modern parts.)
>
>Preferred length is 512 stages.
single units with 512 stages, there was the Reticon SAD512 (which
came in 8 and 16-pin versions), the Phillips TDA 1022 (16-pin), and
the Panasonic MN3002, MN3204, and MN3304 (all 8-pin, afaik). I don't
think there are any others. I have heard conflicting opinions on
whether or not the MN series can be used as direct replacements for
the Reticon chips.