>I have an Octave Cat SRM with the SSM2040 filter chip, and a MOTM 440 >filter. I can vouch for the fact that the 440 filter in the 'normal' mode >sounds >(timbral response) just like the SSM2040 LPF in the Cat. As I use it, the >440 >has a quieter background, although I don't know if that is purely due to >the >filters themselves, or possibly the VCA and other signal paths in the Cat. The original SSM2040 chips are very quiet by themselves, so I guess the total noise depends on the surrounding circuitry a lot. >I also notice when the Cat breaks into resonance at high Q, the >oscillation is >louder (but the same tone), and is a bit less controllable at the >breakpoint >than with the 440. The control aspect could be the age of the synth and >the >use of an old slider for resonance on the Cat vs. the better quality pot >on >the 440...I don't know. I haven't really explored if the two react the >same to >overdrive. The 2040 has no internal resonance path, so every designer had to add this externally, and would do it in different ways. The application in the 2040 data sheet uses a simple potentiometer and a BiFet opamp. Once you want to get voltage controlled resonance, you have plenty of options to implement that function (basically a specialized VCA). The MOTM-440 uses a discrete VCA for this function, with as few transistors in the signal path as possible. >The 440 has also has a Bass switch you can flip to 'Enhance'. This makes >the >low end stay beefed up at higher cutoff and Q (compared to some loss of >bass >on the 'normal' 2040). Nice improvement, and you can always switch back to >the true original response if you want. It's sort of like the loudness >button >on a stereo receiver. This is built upon a special feature of the 2040 (and it's discrete clone's) topology, which allows rather strong overdrive without too unpleasant distortion - thus adding the bass frequencies can happen inside the input / feedback section, rather than after the filter. >John Blacet did a module back in the '70's called the 'Phase Filter'. I >believe it configured the SSM2040 chip into different filter modes. I >wonder if >the MOTM 440 could be modified to do the same? The SSM2040 was a very versatile filter building block, that allows for many different applications. LPF, HPF, BPF, Phaser, you name it. There have been a lot of publications in Electronotes and elsewhere when this chip was popular. (And I bet it was popular as long as it has been _available_!) The MOTM-440 is a complete filter, not a mere copy of a filter _chip_. It's the equivalent of a SSM2040 _plus_ and all the surrounding components in a certain (low pass filter) application. So you can't use a MOTM-440 in other modes. But it'd possible to build all the other SSM2040 applications with the same discrete technique as the MOTM-440. Hey, I even think you could modify an existing MOTM-440 to perform HPF or Phasing tasks, but these would be quite involved modifications. JH.
Message
Re: [motm] Re: [AH] Best CEM-3320 circuit : SSM2040/ MOTM 440
2007-06-23 by JH.
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.