> >>> Do you consider Beatles songs with all the above back in the 60's >>> to be > "real music"?<< > > Which reminds me, I've wanted to call for some kind of synth pop/rock > competition where people would pick some tune from the 60's - 90's > and do a > synthesized version. I've always wanted to do a synth version of the > Beatles "Strawberry Fields Forever", but I'm wondering if even with > a synth, > it's possible to get it as strange and psychedelic sounding as the > original. > However, as you know, over the years the only synth competitions that > succeed are the non-musical aleatoric ones, and any other > suggestions to > doing something that requires musical ability can't get any support > beyond > about two people. Which supports the point in my other thread > about synth > use. > > -Elhardt > For me sound synthesis is almost completely in the realm of my EE knowledge/experience, rather than my musician experience - and I suspect it is that way for most people who use synths. At the very least, programming a synth is a technical task, particularly if you are trying to create a specific sound and not just randomly turning knobs. There probably aren't many people in the world who really understand sound synthesis and are also talented musicians; most people who are great at one are not great at the other. This observation may be obvious, but I think it may partially explain why the aleatoric synth competitions get more interest. People who can listen to a song, transcribe it, arrange it in a novel and creative way, perform and record it, generally are not also people who can program a (modular analog) synth with creative and interesting sounds for all the parts. Almost all the demos AH people post for example, are some variety of dance/techno or whatever the latest name is - drum machine (or at least loop) -based rhythm tracks. Not to knock it; some of it I enjoy listening to (once anyway). One of the reasons I like W. Carlos is he has lots of musical talent as well as technical skills, and the combination of the two results in some really interesting music. This may be really getting off-topic, but all the most talented musicians I know - players and writers - are drawn to acoustic instruments to write and perform on - very few people seem to write traditional music for synthesizer. (I was going to say "actual music", but don't want to open that can.) Maybe its because the synthesizer is still a relatively new instrument, or maybe its something inherent about it - I guess time will tell. ld
Message
Re: [motm] Power of editing
2007-05-14 by Larry David
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.