MOTM

I find that I use the EXT CLK input of the MOTM-101 more than the 
internal clock, typically driving it from a MOTM-390 LFO.  Advantages:  
1) larger range than the internal clock, 2) voltage control of the clock 
rate, 3) with a multiple you can gate other modules, such as a MOTM-800, 
in sync with each new sample.  If external clocking is your typical S&H 
usage, then the limited range of the internal clock isn't a big deal.

Richard Brewster
http://www.pugix.com

Scott Juskiw wrote:
>> I've finished my MOTM-101 noise/s&h, and the clock range seems a bit 
>> too low. According to the specs it should be 0.1 - 20 Hz typical, but 
>> I measure 0.4 .. 13.7 Hz. Which I think is a bit off, to be within
>> the 'typical' range. :-)
>>     
>
> It's probably the pot (VR2) that is the problem. Most pots are only 
> good to within 20%. There's not much you can do to increase the pot's 
> maximum resistance (which affects the lowest frequency of the 
> internal clock), but you can change R23 to compensate. You can also 
> increase the highest frequency by lowering R22.
>
>
>
>