Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-05 20:20 UTC

Message

Re: MOTM-650 V1.3 RC1 bugs reported

2006-10-08 by djbrow54

You are correct and this 'error' should be ignored.  It was my test 
software to try and get MIDI notes in the various ranges.  I had 
written some software to transpose down two octaves and my keyboard
wrapped around to notes -1, -2 -3, etc.

Of course these should have been interpretted as real time single byte 
messages but the problem is that the -650 whould then use the 
following data as the note number and velocity, but of course it was 
just velocity so now the MIDI sequence is all screwed up.  This IS NOT 
an issue with the -650. It was an issue with my test code.

On the good side, I found the -650 performance flawless with MIDI 
notes in the range of 0 - 12 other than the noted unison issue with 
the sustain pedal.

It might be interesting sometime to throw a bunch of real-time 
messages at it and see how it performs.

Sorry for the confusion.

Dave 

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Adam Schabtach" <adam@...> wrote:
>
> 
> > b) sending "illegal" MIDI notes (outside the defined 127 note 
> > range) to the MOTM-650. Apparently, some software programs do
> > this.
> 
> At the risk of trying to troubleshoot a system I'm completely
> unfamiliar with, I'm not sure that that's a correct diagnosis. The
> only way a MIDI note number could be outside of the range [0, 127]
> is if the high bit of its byte was set. The MIDI spec says that if
> the high bit of a byte--any byte--is set, then it's a Status byte,
> not a data byte. [See pages 4-5 of the MIDI spec] So in other words,
> could it be that "some software programs" are sending Status bytes
> that the 650 isn't expecting, rather than "'illegal' MIDI notes"?
> 
> --Adam
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.