>Cancelled products that seemed to have been 'pre-bought' by people. Changing shipping dates. Logistical >problems, communication problems, some raw bad luck. Sounds like many pro audio, software synth, hardware synth, etc. companies! Does anyone remember the Mackie d8b? Two years of promises to ship? And then software updates on and off. Not picking on Mackie (I used to work for them) but the product was discontinued before some of the "features" that were promised were ever realised. MOTM is not alone in the camp that is described above. >A comment was made to me that "a lot of MOTM users are old-school synth guys >in their 50's, they are fine to wait and play with their huge studio". Hey, I take offense to that remark! I'm an old-school synth guy in my 40's. ;-) >I firmly believe that Paul designs the most professional, highest >quality, awe-inspiring modules. He's a brilliant designer, and I don't want >to hurt his feelings or sap his motivation! I just think his designer >skills FAR outshine his business management and PR skills, and it would be >great to see MOTM taken over by someone with the skill and time to focus on >turning it into a stellar business, and free Paul to focus on doing what he >does best - designing killer modules. Let me put this as politely as possible. No "businessperson" in their right mind would have even started MOTM. And no businessperson would take it over right now. There isn't any real money to be made in this business. Just ask Mr. Blacet, Doepfer, Macbeth, Wiard, etc. It is a cool small business but that's it. Frankly, I would love to do a similar thing when/if I retire. The only reason MOTM exists is because Paul wanted it to. I remember when MOTM just came out, and I thought "oh no, another fly-by-night" synth. There are SCORES of them (I won't bother naming names) that I used to lust after, only to find out that they were vapourware. But I saw other ordering modules and I did a little research and started buying a few modules at a time. Now I'm not a huge customer (I think I just bought modules 13 and 14) but nonetheless I am a customer. And why did I buy MOTM? Because I firmly believe it is the highest quality modular synthesizer on the market. Of course I ended up buying kits and then it took me forever to build them and/or have someone assemble a few for me (you know who you are). So moving towards all-assembled kits is just fine with me (I snatched up one of the assembled 510's during the sale... couldn't resist). Funny enough, there are a few MOTM that I'm waiting for such as the bi-phase and the Oberheim filter, but that's about it. After that I'll be Frac-Rac-ing. I've had a few Blacet modules for years and will buy a few more, and then will work on expanding with Paul's Frac products. This Frac system will become my "take out and play" system while the MOTM will sit gracefully in my studio where it doesn't have to endure the abuse of the road. Anyway, MOTM is fantastic, and the new Frac modules are cool for less money but same sound. I've never bought a Doepfer, Analogue Systems, Analogue Solutions, synthesizers.com, or any other modules. Maybe a Modcan module or two, and a couple of Buchla modules are in my future if I have a LOT of extra cash at some point. But for now I'm a happy customer. So, no whining from me, just thanks to Paul and others here for making these modules a reality. Probably because I've been in the pro audio manufacturing industry for the past 20 years I've got a lot more sympathy for where Paul is coming from. And frankly I'm impressed that he's made it this far. Any sane businessman would have given up on it a long time ago. As Paul has mentioned before, he's not exactly getting rich from MOTM. Which would explain why he hasn't quit his day job. But the coolest products in the industry do tend to be a labor of love, and luckily that is the case with MOTM. Ivan ________________________________________________________________________ Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
Message
Re: Vanilla versus yada yada yada
2006-10-04 by ivancu@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.