MOTM

Nice!  Can you describe the patch?

Mike

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
>
> To save time, I put up the full MP3 on my website.  It's 'only' 13MB 
> (about 10 minutes long).
> 
> http://www.pugix.com/music-samples.htm
> 
> If you don't see Cross Product, hit your browser refresh button.
> 
> Richard
> 
> Mike Marsh wrote:
> > Hey Richard -
> >
> > Maybe you could make an exerpt of the piece and MP3 it (ugh) and put
> > it up in the files section.  I'd love to hear it!
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Richard Brewster <pugix@> wrote:
> >   
> >> I of course have the MOTM-120R panel with the daughterboard and 
> >> additional outputs.  But you don't need those modifications to get 
> >> something quite unique, which is the *cross-product modulation*.
 The 
> >> original idea came from Electronotes.  Paul Schreiber simplified the 
> >> circuit and made it easy to use in the 120.  I did a really neat
piece 
> >> with two MOTM-310 VCOs into the 120 in cross-product mode.  It is
long, 
> >> which is why I don't have it on my website.  But I intend to be
> >>     
> > updating 
> >   
> >> my site with a lot more pictures and more music samples,
including ones 
> >> that demonstrate special modules like the 120.  I will make a
shortened 
> >> MP3 of that piece.
> >>
> >> Again, it's the cross-product mode that makes the 120 unique, at
least 
> >> for me.  And with the DC coupled output on the modified version,
I use 
> >> it as a sequencer of sorts, too.  That is all in addition to the
main 
> >> feature of sub-octave generation.
> >>
> >> Richard Brewster
> >> http://www.pugix.com
> >>
> >> Adam Schabtach wrote:
> >>     
> >>>> Good audio of the MOTM-120 in action.
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>> Speaking of the 120, this is a module that isn't in my system and
> >>>       
> > is on the
> >   
> >>> to-be-discontinued list. Does anyone have any samples of this unit
> >>>       
> > online? I
> >   
> >>> find the ones on the MOTM site to be, uh, uncompelling, but the
> >>>       
> > module seems
> >   
> >>> interesting from a theoretical standpoint. Are there any 120
> >>>       
> > owners who
> >   
> >>> would like to show me what I'm missing?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks--
> >>> --Adam
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>       
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>