> Virtually all modular synths have lag processor modules and nearly all > prewired synths do too in the form of portamento. This is sort of a 2-sided coin. The MOTM-650 can now do the portamento, both contastnt rate and constant time. Over 4 independent voices. In fact, even simple MIDI-CV like the Kenton's have portamento. Every CV/Gate out keyboard also has it. There is no "need" for the '820 to do portamento. The MOTM-820 is unique in the independent up/down rates and the fact these are under CV control. As far as "attractive to new users", I looked at the last 25 new customers and 2 have bought '820s. Certainly, I can "bring back to life" the '820 if there is demand. Then I'll be critized for doing so :) Let's see. > > Discontinuing the 850 is also depressing. The good news is that I will publish the full PDF docs this fall on the discontinued modules and you can make one. > > Paul S. has always called motm a hobby. Now it's a business? It's a hobby in the sense that this is not my sole income to support me/wife/2 teenagers (I maybe could support the 2 teenagers). Then again, when you sell 1000 modules/year which means on average I purchase $156,000 of parts/yr, that becomes a business. Then, and this is becoming the most important factor, *time*. I'm 50yrs old, I've been doing this for 8 1/2 years and I still want to design more than fart around with invoices/inventory/worrying if the wire or panel vendor will flake out (again). I miss sitting at the bench for days and days. I feel guilty for even playing video games or watching a movie because there is *always* work needing done (ie there are modules in the backlog). MOTM is on the fine edge of massive hobby/business model. > A while back Paul seemed to indicate that kits might be shipped with most of the components machine stuffed. That would solve the problem of bagging a half million resistors. I'm surprised I haven't heard that mentioned. The person that owned that machine sold it (through-hole axial inserter) after I ran 150 MOTM-480 boards through it. They bought 7 SMT machines instead. Hmmm........ And try to buy 5% resistors, and the other parts on tape and reel, especially after RoHS went into effect. > I can't see how that won't affect sales in a negative way. Unless that 94% kit to 6% assembled customer base has flipped a complete 180. Of *course* in 2007 the number of modules shipped will probably be 1/3 to 1/2 of what it is now. That's the *whole idea*. Like I've explained several times in the past (read the archives!) MOTM was never set up to make the profit needed to support a 'real' company (rent/employees/etc). If you think MOTM is $$$ now, I would have to charge 30% more and *still* personally make the *same* money. What's the point of that? And yes, I am targeting assembled module customers, they fastest growing market segment (shrug). > But modules like the 700, 850, 510, etc, are cool new stuff for > new customers. Actual sales data does not verify this assumption. > If I were new and looking at motm now, those > older modules look far more interesting and cool than a pulse divider. I > don't even know why I'd want to divide pulses, but I could wire up a 30 > cent > flip-flop chip to do it if I needed to. Well, the '730 has 17 simultaneous outputs :) and 1 under CV and it can fractionally divide (by say 4 1/2). If you want to "hear" what it can do, get the Robert Rich CD "Electric Ladder". Paul S.
Message
Re: [motm] Status of discussed future modules
2006-07-10 by synth1@airmail.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.