MOTM

>From: hodad1@...
>Okay,  I was thinking last night:
>According to Paul S., the freq controls on the 410's filters pass out of
the
>audio range aroud the "5" hashmark.  This brings 2 questions to mind:
>1.  Are there good uses for having 1 or more filters in the "only dogs can
>hear" range?  I've toyed with it a bit & have thus far found little of any
>great use there.
being one half of the psychoacoustic soundclash, we had endless fun at a
festival here in sheffield about five years ago. we use a lot of military
surplus electronics (think morse keys, not piano keys) - i think i spent the
entire gig sweeping between about 1Mhz down to 20k or so and back again, not
a huge disturbance from our canine friends, but just enough to make it worth
while
meanwhile (at the other end of the spectrum - heh) at a show at the National
Centre For Popular Music earlier this year, we discovered the resonant
frequency of the bar was around 13Hz - oh joy...

Aren't the beatles supposed to have tarted around with ultrasound on "Sgt
Peppers.." ? anyway, it keeps us industrial types quiet by deluding us into
thinking we're doing something experimental or something...

>2.  What of the idea of changing the value of one or  more pots so that
they
>leave audio around the "10" hashmark?  Seems it would allow for a touchmore
>subtlety.

surely there's nothing more subtle than positions 5 to 10 being beyond the
range of human hearing :-)
>I've asked before &undoubtedly will ask again:  am I high?
not yet


cheers
paulb